ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2021
Impact of Age on Surgical Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Textbook Outcome Failure After Esophagectomy in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older Across the Robotic Transition: Procedural and Intraoperative Determinants and Their Prognostic Consequences.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Age of onset by temporal and spatial changes and prognostic value for esophageal cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Alcohol Consumption and Age-Specific Risk of Esophageal Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Article
- Establishment and validation of survival nomogram score staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after minimally invasive surgery combined with immune prognostic index and clinicopathological features.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis from 2017 to 2020.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025Article
- Nomogram model for predicting long-term survival in esophageal cancer patients with metastasis after treatment: a SEER-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I-III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- [Tailored surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Emergency tracheal intubation peri-operative risk factors and prognostic impact after esophagectomy.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- Gross Tumor Volume Predicts Survival and Pathological Complete Response of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Elderly Patients With Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder patients are often considered high-risk surgical candidates for locally advanced esophageal cancer, and the benefit of surgery in this population is unclear. This national analysis examines the effect of age on esophagectomy outcomes and compares surgery versus chemoradiation in older patients.
methodsThe National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with clinical stage II to III esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery or definitive chemoradiation between 2004 and 2015. Restricted cubic splines were used to examine the relationship between age and survival after esophagectomy, and maximally selected rank statistics were used to identify an age at which survival worsened. We used Cox proportional hazard models including an interaction term between age and treatment to compare overall survival, as well as survival of patients receiving esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiation.
resultsOf 17,495 patients, 11,680 underwent esophagectomy and 5815 received chemoradiation. Survival after esophagectomy worsened with increasing age and decreased considerably after age 73 (hazard ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.06, per increasing year after 73 versus hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01, per increasing year to 73; both P < .001). Chemoradiation was increasingly used over surgery as age increased. The interaction between age and treatment was significant, and a graph of this interaction demonstrated a survival benefit for surgery over chemoradiation at most ages, including octogenarians.
conclusionsSurvival worsens with age after esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy is associated with improved survival compared with definitive chemoradiation at most ages, including octogenarians. Esophagectomy may be considered over chemoradiation for patients who can tolerate surgery regardless of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.