Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853348›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Improved Reference Genome Uncovers Novel Sex-Linked Regions in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Bonnie A Fraser, James R Whiting, Josephine R Paris, Cameron J Weadick, Paul J Parsons, Deborah Charlesworth, Roberta Bergero, Felix Bemm, Margarete Hoffmann, Verena A Kottler and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The next generation of colour pattern genomics.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bonnie A FraserBiosciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
James R WhitingBiosciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Josephine R ParisBiosciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Cameron J WeadickBiosciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Paul J ParsonsBiosciences, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Deborah CharlesworthInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Roberta BergeroInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Felix BemmDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Margarete HoffmannDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Verena A KottlerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Chang LiuDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Christine DreyerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DEUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory predicts that the sexes can achieve greater fitness if loci with sexually antagonistic polymorphisms become linked to the sex determining loci, and this can favor the spread of reduced recombination around sex determining regions. Given that sex-linked regions are frequently repetitive and highly heterozygous, few complete Y chromosome assemblies are available to test these ideas. The guppy system (Poecilia reticulata) has long been invoked as an example of sex chromosome formation resulting from sexual conflict. Early genetics studies revealed that male color patterning genes are mostly but not entirely Y-linked, and that X-linkage may be most common in low-predation populations. More recent population genomic studies of guppies have reached varying conclusions about the size and placement of the Y-linked region. However, this previous work used a reference genome assembled from short-read sequences from a female guppy. Here, we present a new guppy reference genome assembly from a male, using long-read PacBio single-molecule real-time sequencing and chromosome contact information. Our new assembly sequences across repeat- and GC-rich regions and thus closes gaps and corrects mis-assemblies found in the short-read female-derived guppy genome. Using this improved reference genome, we then employed broad population sampling to detect sex differences across the genome. We identified two small regions that showed consistent male-specific signals. Moreover, our results help reconcile the contradictory conclusions put forth by past population genomic studies of the guppy sex chromosome. Our results are consistent with a small Y-specific region and rare recombination in male guppies.

Indexed as

GenomeSex ChromosomesAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleMalePoeciliagenomeguppyPoecilia reticulatapopulation genomicssex chromosome

Identifiers

PMID32853348
PMCPMC7643365
OpenAlexW3082088455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.