Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853339›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

Germline Sequencing DNA Repair Genes in 5545 Men With Aggressive and Nonaggressive Prostate Cancer.

Burcu F Darst, Tokhir Dadaev, Ed Saunders, Xin Sheng, Peggy Wan, Loreall Pooler, Lucy Y Xia, Stephen Chanock, Sonja I Berndt, Susan M Gapstur and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Germline DNA Damage Repair Variants and Prognosis of Patients with High-Risk or Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Predictive Genetic Testing in the Cancer Management and Prevention.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Burcu F DarstCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-4632
Tokhir DadaevThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ed SaundersThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Xin ShengCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Peggy WanCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Loreall PoolerCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lucy Y XiaCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephen ChanockNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-3393
Sonja I BerndtNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Susan M GapsturAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Victoria StevensAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0259-4407
Demetrius AlbanesNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-4293
Stephanie J WeinsteinNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3834-1535
Vincent GnanapragasamDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Graham G GilesCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tu Nguyen-DumontPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roger L MilneCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mark PomerantzDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4914-1157
Julie A SchmidtUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7733-8750
Lorelei MucciHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
William J CatalonaNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kurt N HetrickDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Center for Inherited Disease Research, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly F DohenyDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Center for Inherited Disease Research, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert J MacInnisCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melissa C SoutheyCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6313-9005
Rosalind A EelesThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Fredrik WiklundKarolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.
Zsofia Kote-JaraiThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
David V ContiCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christopher A HaimanCenter for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Southern California · USThe University of Melbourne · AUNational Institutes of Health · USInstitute of Cancer Research · GBAmerican Cancer Society · USJohns Hopkins University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University Press · USKarolinska Institutet · SENorthwestern University · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) StudyZIACP010195 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBANES, DEMETRIUS · 2009 to 2025
$22.5M
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health ProfessionalsU01CA167552 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Lorelei Mucci, Walter C. Willett · 2017 to 2026
$17.0M
The Genetic Basis of Aggressive Prostate Cancer: The Role of Rare VariationR01CA196931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HAIMAN, CHRISTOPHER ALAN, KOTE-JARAI, ZSOFIA · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196931NCI NIH HHS U01 CA167552Prostate Cancer UK PG13-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an urgent need to identify factors specifically associated with aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) risk. We investigated whether rare pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or deleterious (P/LP/D) germline variants in DNA repair genes are associated with aggressive PCa risk in a case-case study of aggressive vs nonaggressive disease.

methodsParticipants were 5545 European-ancestry men, including 2775 nonaggressive and 2770 aggressive PCa cases, which included 467 metastatic cases (16.9%). Samples were assembled from 12 international studies and germline sequenced together. Rare (minor allele frequency < 0.01) P/LP/D variants were analyzed for 155 DNA repair genes. We compared single variant, gene-based, and DNA repair pathway-based burdens by disease aggressiveness. All statistical tests are 2-sided.

resultsBRCA2 and PALB2 had the most statistically significant gene-based associations, with 2.5% of aggressive and 0.8% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D BRCA2 alleles (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94 to 5.25, P = 8.58 × 10-7) and 0.65% of aggressive and 0.11% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D PALB2 alleles (OR = 6.31, 95% CI = 1.83 to 21.68, P = 4.79 × 10-4). ATM had a nominal association, with 1.6% of aggressive and 0.8% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D ATM alleles (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.10 to 3.22, P = .02). In aggregate, P/LP/D alleles within 24 literature-curated candidate PCa DNA repair genes were more common in aggressive than nonaggressive cases (carrier frequencies = 14.2% vs 10.6%, respectively; P = 5.56 × 10-5). However, this difference was non-statistically significant (P = .18) on excluding BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM. Among these 24 genes, P/LP/D carriers had a 1.06-year younger diagnosis age (95% CI = -1.65 to 0.48, P = 3.71 × 10-4).

conclusionsRisk conveyed by DNA repair genes is largely driven by rare P/LP/D alleles within BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM. These findings support the importance of these genes in both screening and disease management considerations.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationProstatic NeoplasmsDNA RepairGenes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm CellsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32853339
PMCPMC8599772
OpenAlexW3082090251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.