Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853281›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Auricular stimulation vs. expressive writing for exam anxiety in medical students - A randomized crossover investigation.

Taras Usichenko, Anna Wenzel, Catharina Klausenitz, Astrid Petersmann, Thomas Hesse, Nicola Neumann, Klaus Hahnenkamp

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Taras UsichenkoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6173-5436
Anna WenzelDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Catharina KlausenitzDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Astrid PetersmannInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas HesseDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Nicola NeumannInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Functional Imaging Unit, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Klaus HahnenkampDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAuricular stimulation (AS) is a promising method in the treatment of situational anxiety. Expressive writing (EW) is an established psychological method, which reduces test anxiety and improves exam results. The aim of this crossover trial was to compare AS with EW, and with the no intervention (NI) condition, for treatment of exam anxiety.

methodsHealthy medical students underwent 3 comparable anatomy exams with an interval of one month, either performing EW, receiving AS or NI prior to the exam; the order of interventions was randomized. AS was applied using indwelling fixed needles bilaterally at the areas innervated mostly by the auricular branch of the vagal nerve on the day before the exam. Anxiety level, measured using State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and after the interventions and immediately before exam, was the primary outcome. Quality of night sleep, blood pressure, heart rate and activity of salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) were analyzed across 3 conditions.

resultsAll 37 included participants completed the study. Anxiety level (STAI) decreased immediately after AS in comparison with baseline (P = 0.02) and remained lower in comparison with that after EW and NI (P<0.01) on the day of exam. After EW and NI anxiety increased on the day of exam in comparison with baseline (P<0.01). Quality of sleep improved after AS in comparison with both control conditions (P<0.01). The activity of sAA decreased after EW and after AS (P<0.05) but not after NI condition.

conclusionAuricular stimulation, but not expressive writing, reduced exam anxiety and improved quality of sleep in medical students. These changes might be due to reduced activity of the sympathetic nervous system.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceAdolescentAdultalpha-AmylasesAnxietyAnxiety DisordersBlood PressureCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleStudents, MedicalWritingYoung Adultalpha-Amylases

Identifiers

PMID32853281
PMCPMC7451547
OpenAlexW3082077916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.