Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853263›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Support or control? Qualitative interviews with Zambian women on male partner involvement in HIV care during and after pregnancy.

Karen M Hampanda, Oliver Mweemba, Yusuf Ahmed, Abigail Hatcher, Janet M Turan, Lynae Darbes, Lisa L Abuogi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen M HampandaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-5500
Oliver MweembaDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Yusuf AhmedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women and Newborn Hospital, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
Abigail HatcherDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Janet M TuranDepartment of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Lynae DarbesDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Lisa L AbuogiCenter for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.

Funding

Promoting HIV health behaviors among pregnant couples in Zambia using an adaptive relationship strengthening interventionK99MH116735 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HAMPANDA, KAREN MARIE · 2018 to 2019
$166k
Gender, Power, and Perinatal HIV in Urban ZambiaF31MH107348 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HAMPANDA, KAREN MARIE · 2015 to 2015
$32k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH107348NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH116735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to promote male partner involvement in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) may inadvertently exploit gender power differentials to achieve programme targets.

methodsWe explored women's relative power and perceptions of male partner involvement through interviews with postpartum Zambian women living with HIV (n = 32) using a critical discourse analysis.

resultsWomen living with HIV reported far-reaching gender power imbalances, including low participation in household decision-making, economic reliance on husbands, and oppressive gendered sexual norms, which hindered their autonomy and prevented optimal mental and physical health during and after their pregnancy. When the husband was HIV-negative, sero-discordance exacerbated women's low power in these heterosexual couples. Male involvement in HIV care was both helpful and hurtful, and often walked a fine line between support for the woman and controlling behaviours over her. Inequities in the sexual divisions of power and labour and gender norms, combined with HIV stigma created challenging circumstances for women navigating the PMTCT cascade.

conclusionsFuture programmes should consider the benefits and risks of male partner involvement within specific relationships and according to women's needs, rather than advocating for universal male involvement in PMTCT. This work highlights the persistent need for gender transformative approaches alongside PMTCT efforts.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicPower, PsychologicalSocial SupportAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantMalePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSexual PartnersSocial StigmaYoung AdultZambia

Identifiers

PMID32853263
PMCPMC7451516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.