Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853258›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Increasing participation in research with therapy dogs: A qualitative study at a large urban mental health and addiction hospital.

Laura Sikstrom, Tamar Meyer, Eva Katz, Man-Man Choi, Margaret Darragh, Amanda Cutler-Palma, Theresa Conforti, Csilla Kalocsai, Sophie Soklaridis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura SikstromOffice of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tamar MeyerOffice of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eva KatzOffice of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Man-Man ChoiGeriatric Mental Health Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Margaret DarraghComplex Care & Recovery Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda Cutler-PalmaGeriatric Mental Health Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Theresa ConfortiVolunteer Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Csilla KalocsaiOffice of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sophie SoklaridisOffice of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-8473
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefits of involving patients as partners in research across diverse medical and psychiatric settings are well established in the literature. However, researchers continue to struggle to access, engage and retain participants from hard-to-reach populations. The main objective of this study was to co-create pet therapy activities with patients admitted for serious and complex mental illness to a large urban mental health and addiction hospital. Informed by the principles of participatory action research methodology, we conducted focus group discussions with 38 inpatients in seven different clinical units. An experienced volunteer handler and a certified therapy dog helped facilitate our discussions. Participating researchers, recreational therapists, volunteer handlers and our participants all reported that the presence of a certified therapy dog at each of our discussions was integral to their success. Certified therapy dogs increased the motivation to participate in our study, helped to build rapport with participants and created connections in our discussions that enriched our data. To our knowledge our study is the first to demonstrate the value of using a therapy dog as a participatory research tool in a healthcare setting. The authors believe that therapy dogs are a low-tech intervention that could be used effectively to engage hard-to-reach populations in research about their treatment and care in a diverse range of medical settings. These findings support the creation of a pilot study to test the value of including therapy dogs in patient-centered research with vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations.

Indexed as

Animal Assisted TherapyAnimalsCitiesDogsFemaleHospitalsMaleMental HealthMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID32853258
PMCPMC7451510
OpenAlexW3080365806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.