ArticlePloS one2020
Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trust and interaction design in AI-enabled systems: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Developing a prospective ethical governance framework for a discrete choice experiment involving children aged 6-12 years: the PREF-ANX Kids study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Digital technologies in ethnobiology and ethnoecology: methodological opportunities, ethical challenges, and participatory implications.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Review
- StressSpeak: A Speech-Driven Framework for Real-Time Personalized Stress Detection and Adaptive Psychological Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A systematic review of developments in mHealth smartphone applications for Transgender and Gender Diverse individuals.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Refining Established Practices for Research Question Definition to Foster Interdisciplinary Research Skills in a Digital Age: Consensus Study With Nominal Group Technique.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- A collaborative realist review of remote measurement technologies for depression in young people.Nature human behaviour · 2024Review
- The Use of Social Media to Express and Manage Medical Uncertainty in Dyskeratosis Congenita: Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
- Population dynamics and digitalization: implications for COVID-19 data sources in South Africa-a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A Pilot Study Conducting Online Think Aloud Qualitative Method during Social Distancing: Benefits and Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Caught on Camera: On the Need of Responsible Use of Video Observation for Animal Behavior and Welfare Research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Teen Girls' Experiences Negotiating the Ubiquitous Dick Pic: Sexual Double Standards and the Normalization of Image Based Sexual Harassment.Sex roles · 2021Article
- The Urgent Need for Management of Biological Samples and Data Accessibility in Latin America.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Improving Informed Consent for Novel Vaccine Research in a Pediatric Hospital Setting Using a Blended Research-Design Approach.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While emerging digital health technologies offer researchers new avenues to collect real-time data, little is known about current ethical dimensions, considerations, and challenges that are associated with conducting digital data collection in research with minors. As such, this paper reports the findings of a scoping review which explored existing literature to canvass current ethical issues that arise when using digital data collection in research with minors. Scholarly literature was searched using electronic academic databases for articles that provided explicit ethical analysis or presented empirical research that directly addressed ethical issues related to digital data collection used in research with minors. After screening 1,156 titles and abstracts, and reviewing 73 full-text articles, 20 articles were included in this review. Themes which emerged across the reviewed literature included: consent, data handling, minors' data rights, observing behaviors that may result in risk of harm to participants or others, private versus public conceptualizations of data generated through social media, and gatekeeping. Our findings indicate a degree of uncertainty which invariably exists with regards to the ethics of research that involves minors and digital technology. The reviewed literature suggests that this uncertainty can often lead to the preclusion of minors from otherwise important lines of research inquiry. While uncertainty warrants ethical consideration, increased ethical scrutiny and restricting the conduct of such research raises its own ethical challenges. We conclude by discussing and recommending the ethical merits of co-producing ethical practice between researchers and minors as a mechanism to proceed with such research while addressing concerns around uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.