Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853005›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2020

Measurement nonequivalence of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale by race/ethnicity: Implications for quantifying posttraumatic stress disorder severity.

Lesia M Ruglass, Antonio A Morgan-López, Lissette M Saavedra, Denise A Hien, Skye Fitzpatrick, Therese K Killeen, Sudie E Back, Teresa López-Castro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lesia M RuglassCenter of Alcohol & Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University-New Brunswick.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-5358
Antonio A Morgan-LópezRTI International.
Lissette M SaavedraRTI International.
Denise A HienCenter of Alcohol & Substance Use Studies, Rutgers University-New Brunswick.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-2882
Skye FitzpatrickDepartment of Psychology, York University.
Therese K KilleenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Sudie E BackDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Teresa López-CastroDepartment of Psychology, The City College of New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-6329
Medical University of South Carolina · USRTI International · USCity College of New York · USInstitute of Alcohol Studies · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USYork University · CA

Funding

Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data for PTSD/AODsR01AA025853 · NIAAA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI HIEN, DENISE AIMEE, MORGAN-LOPEZ, ANTONIO A · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025853NIDA NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research studies suggest racial/ethnic differences in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis and symptom severity. Few studies to date, however, have examined the extent to which these findings are due to differences in measurement properties of existing PTSD scales. This study examined measurement equivalence across race/ethnicity in the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) by testing for differential item functioning (DIF) in the item response theory (IRT) framework. Participants were 506 trauma-exposed women (M = 39.41 years, SD = 8.94) who participated in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Women and Trauma Study. PTSD severity score estimates were improved upon as part of IRT estimation incorporating symptom "weights" (i.e., factor loadings) and group-specific DIF. Six symptoms from the CAPS showed DIF, with the majority of differences in measurement driven by White/African American and White/Latina differences, particularly for (a) avoidance of thoughts and (b) a sense of foreshortened future. Despite both racial/ethnic minority groups being slightly (not significantly) more likely to receive a PTSD diagnosis, African Americans (p = .014; Cohen's d = -.22) and Latinas (p < .001; d = -.73) had significantly lower PTSD severity scores than Whites as estimated under IRT with group-specific DIF. Examination of PTSD severity scores based on symptom counts revealed these differences were either dampened (White/Latina difference d = -.39) or entirely negated (White/African American difference d = -.08). The findings suggest the importance of considering differences in symptom relevance across race/ethnicity and their impact on capturing symptom severity parallel to diagnostic criteria. Implications for clinical practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdultBlack or African AmericanEthnicityFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedMinority GroupsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticWhite People

Identifiers

PMID32853005
PMCPMC8136270
OpenAlexW3082088379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.