SynthesisBJS open2020
Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimally invasive repair of iatrogenic bile duct injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- SAGES-AHPBA 2025: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the surgical management of bile duct injury following cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment of Bile Duct Transection Injury in an Integrated System.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Third-Redo Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Recurrent Anastomotic Stones: A Video-Based Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Algorithms for management of patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury: a single-center experience.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Management of Iatrogenic Bile-Duct Injury After Cholecystectomy, 1995-2025: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reconstruction of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Prospective analysis of preoperative C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of postoperative complications in bile duct injury repair.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy complications at a Nigerian tertiary health facility.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Bile Duct Injuries after Cholecystectomy: An Individual Patient Data Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Waiting for bile duct dilation before repair of bile duct injury: a worthwhile strategy?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Bile duct injury after cholecystectomy: timing of surgical repair should be based on clinical presentation. The experience of a tertiary referral center with Hepp-Couinaud hepatico-jejunostomy.Updates in surgery · 2023Observational
- Initial management of suspected biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury: state of the art.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Review
- Early versus delayed reconstruction for bile duct injury a multicenter retrospective analysis of a hepatopancreaticobiliary group.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Timing of surgical repair of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.World journal of hepatology · 2022Article
- Performance of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement calculator for early postoperative outcomes following bile duct repair hepaticojejunostomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- EUS-guided biliary drainage in a patient after postcholecystectomy complete biliary transection (with video).Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy generally requires surgical reconstruction by means of hepaticojejunostomy. However, there is controversy regarding the optimal timing of surgical reconstruction.
methodsA systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies published between 1990 and 2018 reporting on the timing of hepaticojejunostomy for BDI (PROSPERO registration CRD42018106611). The main outcomes were postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality and anastomotic stricture. When individual patient data were available, time intervals of these studies were attuned to render these comparable with other studies. Data for comparable time intervals were pooled using a random-effects model. In addition, data for all included studies were pooled using a generalized linear model.
resultsSome 21 studies were included, representing 2484 patients. In these studies, 15 different time intervals were used. Eight studies used the time intervals of less than 14 days (early), 14 days to 6 weeks (intermediate) and more than 6 weeks (delayed). Meta-analysis revealed a higher risk of postoperative morbidity in the intermediate interval (early versus intermediate: risk ratio (RR) 0·73, 95 per cent c.i. 0·54 to 0·98; intermediate versus delayed: RR 1·50, 1·16 to 1·93). Stricture rate was lowest in the delayed interval group (intermediate versus delayed: RR 1·53, 1·07 to 2·20). Postoperative mortality did not differ within time intervals. The additional analysis demonstrated increased odds of postoperative morbidity for reconstruction between 2 and 6 weeks, and decreased odds of anastomotic stricture for delayed reconstruction.
conclusionThis meta-analysis found that surgical reconstruction of BDI between 2 and 6 weeks should be avoided as this was associated with higher risk of postoperative morbidity and hepaticojejunostomy stricture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.