Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852746›Full record

ReviewDrugs2020

Movement of Poly-ADP Ribose (PARP) Inhibition into Frontline Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.

Michaela Onstad, Robert L Coleman, Shannon N Westin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michaela OnstadDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Herman Pressler Dr. CPB 6.3279, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Robert L ColemanUS Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
Shannon N WestinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Herman Pressler Dr. CPB 6.3279, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. swestin@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-0156
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe US Oncology Network · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
U.T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Ovarian CancerP50CA217685 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SOOD, ANIL K · 2017 to 2021
$7.9M
NCI NIH HHS 1P50CA217685-01NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217685NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the front-line management of advanced ovarian cancer has recently emerged as an exciting strategy with the potential to improve outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this article, we review the results of four recently published Phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of PARP inhibitors in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer (SOLO1, PRIMA, PAOLA-1, and VELIA). Collectively, the studies suggest that PARP maintenance in the upfront setting is most beneficial among patients with BRCA-associated ovarian cancers (hazard ratios range from 0.31 to 0.44), followed by patients with tumours that harbour homologous recombination deficiencies (hazard ratios range from 0.33 to 0.57). All three studies that included an all-comer population were able to demonstrate benefit of PARP inhibitors, regardless of biomarker status. The FDA has approved olaparib for front-line maintenance therapy among patients with BRCA-associated ovarian cancers, and niraparib for all patients, regardless of biomarker status. In determining which patients should be offered front-line maintenance PARP inhibitors, and which agent to use, there are multiple factors to consider, including FDA indication, dosing preference, toxicity, risks versus benefits for each patient population, and cost. There are ongoing studies further exploring the front-line use of PARP inhibitors, including the potential downstream effects of PARP-inhibitor resistance in the recurrent setting, combining PARP-inhibitors with other anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and inhibitors of pathways implicated in PARP inhibitor resistance.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug ApprovalDrug CostsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansIndazolesMaintenance ChemotherapyMutationOvarian NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanIndazolesniraparibolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPiperidinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID32852746
PMCPMC7541632
OpenAlexW3080564481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.