ArticleEndocrine2021
Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) for ultrasound features of nodules: multicentric retrospective study in China.
Article in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Do thyroid nodules in the isthmus carry a higher risk of malignancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Malignant Risk Assessment of Cystic-solid Thyroid Nodules Based on Multimodal Ultrasound Features: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic efficiency among Eu-/C-/ACR-TIRADS and S-Detect for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of C-TIRADS in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- 2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS.Endocrine · 2020Guideline
- Artificial intelligence-based multimodal multitask analysis of thyroid ultrasound image features predicts thyroid cancer: a multicenter study.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Application of AmCAD-UT in Active Surveillance of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma and Suspicious Subcentimeter Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Agreement Study.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Nomogram for predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma risk combined with clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic indicators.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- When cytology misses and ultrasound warns: the predictive role of BRAFV600E mutation in thyroid nodules.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Article
- Application of fine-needle aspiration biopsy combined with multi-gene testing in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant C-TIRADS 4 thyroid nodules.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of early complete nodule shrinkage in symptomatic benign thyroid nodules treated with radiofrequency ablation with or without sclerotherapy: a retrospective study.European radiology · 2025Article
- The value of C-TIRADS combined with multidimensional indicators in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Comprehensive linkage between molecular biology and imaging radiomics for thyroid nodules.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve thermal injury in radiofrequency ablation for papillary thyroid carcinoma and related risk factors: a prospective large cohort study.European radiology · 2025Article
- Dual-stage artificial intelligence-powered screening for accurate classification of thyroid nodules: enhancing fine needle aspiration biopsy precision.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Ultrasonographic differentiation of medullary thyroid carcinoma from papillary thyroid carcinoma: quantitative comparison of morphologic features and different TIRADS risk categorizations.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of C-TIRADS category 4 thyroid nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram based on conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish a practical and simplified Chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data system (C-TIRADS) based on the Chinese patient database.
methodsA total of 2141 thyroid nodules that were neither cystic nor spongy were used in the current study. These specimens were derived from 2141 patients in 131 alliance hospitals of the Chinese Artificial Intelligence Alliance for Thyroid and Breast Ultrasound. The ultrasound features, including location, orientation, margin, halo, composition, echogenicity, echotexture, echogenic foci and posterior features were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the association between ultrasound features and malignancy. The regression equation, the weighting, and the counting methods were used to determine the malignant risk of the thyroid nodules. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az values) were calculated.
resultsOf the 2141 thyroid nodules, 1572 were benign, 565 were malignant, and 4 were borderline. Vertical orientation, ill-defined, or irregular margin (including extrathyroidal extension), microcalcifications, solid, and markedly hypoechoic were positively associated with malignancy, while comet-tail artifacts were negatively associated with malignancy. The logistic regression equation yielded the highest Az value of 0.913, which was significantly higher than that obtained using the weighting method (0.893) and the counting method (0.890); however, no significant difference was found between the latter two. The C-TIRADS, based on the counting method, was designed following the principle of balancing the diagnostic performance and sensitivity of the risk stratification with the ease of use.
conclusionsA relatively simple C-TIRADS was established using the counting value of positive and negative ultrasound features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32852733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.