Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852658›Full record

SynthesisThe Psychiatric quarterly2020

Effectiveness and Safety of Ketamine for Unipolar Depression: a Systematic Review.

Raheel Imtiaz Memon, Sadiq Naveed, Amber Ehsan Faquih, Ania Fida, Noureen Abbas, Amna Mohyud Din Chaudhary, Zheala Qayyum

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Rapid-acting antidepressants and the circadian clock.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Raheel Imtiaz MemonResident Physician, Henry Ford Allegiance Health, Jackson, MI, USA.
Sadiq NaveedUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, USA. naveed193@gmail.com.
Amber Ehsan FaquihDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ania FidaKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Noureen AbbasFMH College of Medicine & Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan.
Amna Mohyud Din ChaudharyNishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.
Zheala QayyumBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · USCMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry · PKDow University of Health Sciences · PKHenry Ford Allegiance Health · USKing Edward Medical University · PKNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PKUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder with major implications for healthcare system and socioeconomic burden. For chronic and treatment-resistant depression, Ketamine has emerged as a possible treatment option. This systematic review explores the evidence for the effectiveness and tolerability of Ketamine in patients with MDD. This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Eight electronic databases were searched by using search terms: (ketamine) AND (trial OR RCT OR clinical-trial) AND (depressive OR depression OR "depressive-disorder"). After a rigorous screening process against the predetermined eligibility criteria, 35 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Quality assessment of included studies was done by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. Thirty-five RCTs are included in this review article with majority of studies from United States, Iran, and China. Intravenous (IV) Ketamine was effective in 70% (21/30) of the included studies whereas oral and Intranasal (IN) Ketamine were effective in two and three studies, respectively. The majority of studies (6/8) using Ketamine as anesthetic agent during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) failed to show an improvement compared to the participants receiving ECT and placebo. The most common reported side effects were nausea, vomiting, dizziness, diplopia, drowsiness, dysphoria, hallucinations, and confusion. Ketamine is an effective treatment option for patients with MDD with undesirable effects when administered via oral, IV and IN routes. Ketamine agumentation of ECT requires further exploration in well-designed studies with adequate sample size. The short-lived antidepressant effect of Ketamine is a potential limitation, therefore, further studies administering multiple infusions for acute treatment and maintenance are necessary.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsElectroconvulsive TherapyHumansKetamineMajor Depressive DisorderTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsKetamineKetamineMajor depressive disorderMDDTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID32852658
OpenAlexW3081096471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.