Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852582›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2021

Neurofilament light as an outcome predictor after cardiac arrest: a post hoc analysis of the COMACARE trial.

Lauri Wihersaari, Nicholas J Ashton, Matti Reinikainen, Pekka Jakkula, Ville Pettilä, Johanna Hästbacka, Marjaana Tiainen, Pekka Loisa, Hans Friberg, Tobias Cronberg and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical use and reporting of neurofilament quantification in neurological disorders: A global overview.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lauri WihersaariDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Matti ReinikainenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Pekka JakkulaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ville PettiläDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna HästbackaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Marjaana TiainenDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pekka LoisaDepartment of Intensive Care, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Hans FribergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Tobias CronbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Markus B SkrifvarsDepartment of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. markus.skrifvars@hus.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-0262
COMACARE STUDY GROUP
University of Helsinki · FIKuopio University Hospital · FIPäijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FILund University · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEKing's College London · GB

Funding

Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (#201809-2016862European Research Council #681712European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders JPND2019-466-236Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri TYH2018227Hjärnfonden #FO2017-0243Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa 2018, 2019Stiftelsen Dorothea Olivia, Karl Walter och Jarl Walter Perkléns Minne 2018, 2019Swedish Research Council #2018-02532Swedish Reserach Council #2017-00915Swedish State Support for Clinical Research #ALFGBG-720931The Swedish Alzheimer Foundation #AF-742881the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement #ALFGBG-715986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeurofilament light (NfL) is a biomarker reflecting neurodegeneration and acute neuronal injury, and an increase is found following hypoxic brain damage. We assessed the ability of plasma NfL to predict outcome in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We also compared plasma NfL concentrations between patients treated with two different targets of arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO

methodsWe measured NfL concentrations in plasma obtained at intensive care unit admission and at 24, 48, and 72 h after OHCA. We assessed neurological outcome at 6 months and defined a good outcome as Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2 and poor outcome as CPC 3-5.

resultsSix-month outcome was good in 73/112 (65%) patients. Forty-eight hours after OHCA, the median NfL concentration was 19 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-31) pg/ml in patients with good outcome and 2343 (587-5829) pg/ml in those with poor outcome, p < 0.001. NfL predicted poor outcome with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.00) at 24 h, 0.98 (0.97-1.00) at 48 h, and 0.98 (0.95-1.00) at 72 h. NfL concentrations were lower in the higher MAP (80-100 mmHg) group than in the lower MAP (65-75 mmHg) group at 48 h (median, 23 vs. 43 pg/ml, p = 0.04). PaCO

conclusionsNfL demonstrated excellent prognostic accuracy after OHCA. Higher MAP was associated with lower NfL concentrations.

Indexed as

Intermediate FilamentsOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestArterial PressureBlood Gas AnalysisComaHumansBiomarkersCardiac arrestNeurofilament light (NfL)Prognostication

Identifiers

PMID32852582
PMCPMC7782453
OpenAlexW3080950432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.