Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852553›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Effect of a Daily Text Messaging and Directly Supervised Therapy Intervention on Oral Mercaptopurine Adherence in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Smita Bhatia, Lindsey Hageman, Yanjun Chen, F Lennie Wong, Elizabeth L McQuaid, Christina Duncan, Leo Mascarenhas, David Freyer, Nkechi Mba, Paula Aristizabal and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01503632 (A Comprehensive Approach to Improve Medication Adherence in Pediatric ALL), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01503632 phase3completednot on this map

A Comprehensive Approach to Improve Medication Adherence in Pediatric ALL

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Oncology GroupRan2012 to 2026Enrolled570ConditionsAcute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaArmsBehavioral Intervention, Compliance Monitoring, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Mercaptopurine, Questionnaire Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Check the Impact of Mobile Health on Medication Adherence in Adolescents with Leukemia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Future of Treatment of Adolescents and Young Adults With ALL: A Vision for Collaboration and Equity.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  16. Challenges to successful outcomes in AYAs with ALL and potential solutions.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Smita BhatiaInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Lindsey HagemanInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Yanjun ChenInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
F Lennie WongDepartment of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Elizabeth L McQuaidDepartment of Psychiatryand Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Christina DuncanDepartment of Psychology,West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Leo MascarenhasCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
David FreyerCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Nkechi MbaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Driscoll Children's Hospital, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Paula AristizabalDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.
David WalterhouseDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Glen LewAflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Pamela Helen-Heilge KempertDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Miller Children's and Women's Hospital, Long Beach, California.
Thomas Bennett RussellWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Rene Y McNall-KnappDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Shana JacobsDepartment of Oncology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Ha DangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Elizabeth RaetzDepartment of Pediatrics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Mary V RellingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Wendy LandierInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Southern California · USAflac (United States) · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USBrown University · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USChildren's National · USCity of Hope · USDriscoll Children's Hospital · USLurie Children's Hospital · USMiller Children's & Women's Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
Towards a preventive cancer vaccine for children with constitutional mismatch repair deficiencyUG1CA189955 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI BRAD H POLLOCK, Michael E. Roth · 2014 to 2026
$62.5M
Community Clinical Oncology Program Research BaseU10CA095861 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI POLLOCK, BRAD H · 2002 to 2013
$19.5M
Comprehensive Approach to Improve Medicine Adherence in Pediatric LeukmiaR01CA174683 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BHATIA, SMITA, LANDIER, WENDY · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
COMPRENDO: Adaptation and Implementation of a Peer-Navigation Intervention to Improve Research Literacy and Diversity in Pediatric Leukemia Clinical TrialsK08CA230306 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARISTIZABAL, PAULA · 2018 to 2023
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA230306NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174683NCI NIH HHS U10 CA095861NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Suboptimal adherence to oral mercaptopurine treatment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) increases the risk of relapse. A frequently expressed barrier to adherence is forgetfulness, which is often overcome by parental vigilance. Objective: To determine whether a multicomponent intervention, compared with education alone, will result in a higher proportion of patients with ALL who have mercaptopurine adherence rates 95% or higher, for all study participants and among patients younger than 12 years and vs those aged 12 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: The adherence intervention trial was an investigator-initiated, multi-institutional, parallel-group, unblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted between July 16, 2012, and August 8, 2018, at 59 Children's Oncology Group institutions in the US, enrolling patients with ALL diagnosed through age 21 years and receiving mercaptopurine for maintenance. The date of final follow-up was January 2, 2019. Data analysis was performed from February to October 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to education alone or the intervention package, which consisted of education and personalized text message reminders daily to prompt directly supervised therapy. Four weeks of baseline adherence monitoring were followed with a 16-week intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with adherence rates 95% or higher over the duration of the intervention for all study participants, and for those younger than 12 years vs those aged 12 years and older. Results: There were 444 evaluable patients (median age, 8.1 years; interquartile range, 5.3-14.3 years), including 230 in the intervention group and 214 in the education group. Three hundred two patients (68.0%) were boys, 180 (40.5%) were non-Hispanic White, 170 (38.3%) were Hispanic, 43 (9.7%) were African American, and 51 (11.5%) were Asian or of mixed race/ethnicity. The proportion of patients with adherence rates 95% or higher did not differ between the intervention vs education groups (65% vs 59%; odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0; P = .08). Exploratory analyses showed that among patients aged 12 years and older, those in the intervention group had higher mean (SE) adherence rates than those in the education group (93.1% [1.1%] vs 90.0% [1.3%]; difference, 3.1%; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.0%; P = .04). In particular, among patients aged 12 years and older with baseline adherence less than 90%, those in the intervention group had higher mean (SE) adherence rates than those in the education group (83.4% [2.5%] vs 74.6% [3.4%]; difference, 8.8%; 95% CI, 2.2%-15.4%; P = .008). No safety concerns were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: Although this multicomponent intervention did not result in an increase in the proportion of patients with ALL who had mercaptopurine adherence rates 95% or higher, it did identify a high-risk subpopulation to target for future adherence intervention strategies: adolescents with low baseline adherence. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01503632.

Indexed as

Directly Observed TherapyDrug MonitoringText MessagingAdolescentAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMercaptopurinePatient Education as TopicPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMercaptopurine

Identifiers

PMID32852553
PMCPMC7453312
OpenAlexW3080941325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.