Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852552›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Plasma Biomarker Concentrations Associated With Return to Sport Following Sport-Related Concussion in Collegiate Athletes-A Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium Study.

Cassandra L Pattinson, Timothy B Meier, Vivian A Guedes, Chen Lai, Christina Devoto, Thaddeus Haight, Steven P Broglio, Thomas McAllister, Christopher Giza, Daniel Huber and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Cassandra L PattinsonNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Timothy B MeierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Vivian A GuedesNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Chen LaiNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Christina DevotoNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Thaddeus HaightCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Steven P BroglioMichigan Concussion Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Thomas McAllisterDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Christopher GizaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, UCLA Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program, University of California, Los Angeles.
Daniel HuberDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Jaroslaw HarezlakDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Kenneth CameronKeller Army Community Hospital, West Point, New York.
Gerald McGintyUnited States Air Force Academy, Colorado.
Jonathan JacksonUnited States Air Force Academy, Colorado.
Kevin GuskiewiczMatthew Gfeller Sport-Related Traumatic Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Jason MihalikMatthew Gfeller Sport-Related Traumatic Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Alison BrooksDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Stefan DumaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
Steven RowsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
Lindsay D NelsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Paul PasquinaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Michael McCreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Jessica M GillNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
CARE Consortium Investigators
Medical College of Wisconsin · USNational Institutes of Health · USUnited States Air Force Academy · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVirginia Tech · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USIndiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University School of MedicineKeller Army Community Hospital · USNational Institute of Nursing Research · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Identifying plasma biomarkers associated with the amount of time an athlete may need before they return to sport (RTS) following a sport-related concussion (SRC) is important because it may help to improve the health and safety of athletes. Objective: To examine whether plasma biomarkers can differentiate collegiate athletes who RTS in less than 14 days or 14 days or more following SRC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter prospective diagnostic study, conducted by the National Collegiate Athletics Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium, included 127 male and female athletes who had sustained an SRC while enrolled at 6 Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium Advanced Research Core sites as well as 2 partial-Advanced Research Core military service academies. Data were collected between February 2015 and May 2018. Athletes with SRC completed clinical testing and blood collection at preseason (baseline), postinjury (0-21 hours), 24 to 48 hours postinjury, time of symptom resolution, and 7 days after unrestricted RTS. Main Outcomes and Measures: A total of 3 plasma biomarkers (ie, total tau protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], and neurofilament light chain protein [Nf-L]) were measured using an ultrasensitive single molecule array technology and were included in the final analysis. RTS was examined between athletes who took less than 14 days vs those who took 14 days or more to RTS following SRC. Linear mixed models were used to identify significant interactions between period by RTS group. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to examine whether these plasma biomarkers could discriminate between RTS groups. Results: The 127 participants had a mean (SD) age of 18.9 (1.3) years, and 97 (76.4%) were men; 65 (51.2%) took less than 14 days to RTS, and 62 (48.8%) took 14 days or more to RTS. Linear mixed models identified significant associations for both mean (SE) plasma total tau (24-48 hours postinjury, <14 days RTS vs ≥14 days RTS: -0.65 [0.12] pg/mL vs -0.14 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008) and GFAP (postinjury, 14 days RTS vs ≥14 days RTS: 4.72 [0.12] pg/mL vs 4.39 [0.11] pg/mL; P = .04). Total tau at the time of symptom resolution had acceptable discrimination power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; P < .001). We also examined a combined plasma biomarker panel that incorporated Nf-L, GFAP, and total tau at each period to discriminate RTS groups. Although the analyses did reach significance at each time period when combined, results indicated that they were poor at distinguishing the groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, <0.7). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that measures of total tau and GFAP may identify athletes who will require more time to RTS. However, further research is needed to improve our ability to determine recovery following an SRC.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionAdolescentAdultAthletesBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReturn to SportStudentstau ProteinsUniversitiesYoung AdultBiomarkersMAPT protein, humantau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32852552
PMCPMC7453307
OpenAlexW3080575275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.