Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852530›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2020

Efficacy and Safety of 2 Fingolimod Doses vs Glatiramer Acetate for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bruce A C Cree, Myla D Goldman, John R Corboy, Barry A Singer, Edward J Fox, Douglas L Arnold, Corey Ford, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Amit Bar-Or, Susanne Mientus and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01633112 (A 12-month, Randomized, Rater- and Dose-blinded Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg Administered Orally Once Daily With Glatiramer Acetate 20 mg Administered Subcutaneously Once Daily in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01633112 phase3terminatednot on this map

A 12-month, Randomized, Rater- and Dose-blinded Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg Administered Orally Once Daily With Glatiramer Acetate 20 mg Administered Subcutaneously Once Daily in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2018Enrolled1,064ConditionsRelapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)Armsfingolimod, glatiramer acetate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Clinical and radiological outcomes of directed treatment transitions from GilenyaMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Choosing initial MS therapy; personal, disease, and medication factors.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Fingolimod as a first- or second-line treatment in a mini-series of young Hellenic patients with adolescent-onset multiple sclerosis: focus on immunological data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruce A C CreeUCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Myla D GoldmanDepartment of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
John R CorboyRocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Barry A SingerThe Multiple Sclerosis Center for Innovations in Care, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, St Louis.
Edward J FoxCentral Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock.
Douglas L ArnoldMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Corey FordUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Bianca Weinstock-GuttmanJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Amit Bar-OrPerelman School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Susanne MientusNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel SienkiewiczNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Ying ZhangNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Rajesh KaranNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Nadia TenenbaumNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
ASSESS Trial Investigators
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHCentral Texas Neurology Consultants · USMissouri Baptist Medical Center · USMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceDoses of fingolimod lower than 0.5 mg per day were not investigated during the fingolimod clinical development program. Whether lower doses of fingolimod might retain efficacy with fewer safety risks remains unknown.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod, 0.5 mg, and fingolimod, 0.25 mg, compared with glatiramer acetate and to assess whether these doses of fingolimod show superior efficacy to glatiramer acetate in adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

interventionsFingolimod, 0.5 mg, or fingolimod, 0.25 mg, orally once per day or glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, subcutaneously once per day. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe Multiple Sclerosis Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Fingolimod Versus Copaxone (ASSESS) was a phase 3b multicenter randomized rater-blinded and dose-blinded 12-month clinical trial conducted between August 9, 2012, and April 30, 2018 (including the time required to recruit participants). A total of 1461 patients aged 18 to 65 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened, and 1064 participants were randomized. These participants had at least 1 documented relapse during the previous year or 2 documented relapses during the previous 2 years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0 to 6 at screening. Data were analyzed between September and November 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The superiority of the fingolimod doses was tested hierarchically, with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, tested first, followed by fingolimod, 0.25 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. The primary end point was the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR). Magnetic resonance imaging parameters, safety, and tolerability were also assessed.

resultsOf 1461 adult patients screened, 1064 participants (72.8%) were randomized (mean [SD] age, 39.6 [11.0] years; 792 women [74.4%]) to 3 treatment groups: 352 participants received fingolimod, 0.5 mg, 370 participants received fingolimod, 0.25 mg, and 342 participants received glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. In total, 859 participants (80.7%) completed the study. Treatment with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, was superior to treatment with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, in reducing ARR (40.7% relative reduction); the relative reduction with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, was 14.6%, which was not statistically significant (for fingolimod, 0.5 mg, ARR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11-0.21; for fingolimod, 0.25 mg, ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.17-0.29; for glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, ARR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34). Treatment with both fingolimod doses (0.5 mg and 0.25 mg) significantly reduced new or newly enlarging T2 and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions compared with treatment with glatiramer acetate. Adverse events were reported in similar proportions across treatment groups (312 participants [90.4%] in the fingolimod, 0.5 mg, group, 323 participants [88.3%] in the fingolimod, 0.25 mg, group, and 283 participants [87.3%] in the glatiramer acetate group). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, demonstrated superior clinical efficacy compared with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, and had a superior benefit-risk profile compared with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, in adult participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01633112.

Identifiers

PMID32852530
PMCPMC7445630
OpenAlexW3080089603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.