Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852278›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Development of a Mobile Health Intervention with Personal Experiments for Smokers Who Are Ambivalent About Quitting: Formative Design and Testing.

Jaimee L Heffner, Sheryl L Catz, Predrag Klasnja, Brooks Tiffany, Jennifer B McClure

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaimee L HeffnerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-5489
Sheryl L CatzBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Sacramento, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-9349
Predrag KlasnjaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-703X
Brooks TiffanyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3023-2067
Jennifer B McClureKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-9147
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUC Davis Health · US

Funding

Development of a mHealth Intervention for Ambivalent Smokers: A Pilot Feasibility StudyR21CA234003 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCCLURE, JENNIFER B · 2019 to 2020
$386k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA234003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of cigarette smokers want to quit someday but are not ready to commit to long-term abstinence. However, available smoking cessation treatments are not well-suited to meet the needs of these ambivalent smokers. Low-cost, high-reach mobile health (mHealth) interventions may be a cost-efficient means of offering assistance to ambivalent smokers, yet there are currently no evidence-based options available for this group.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and preliminarily evaluate the core content for an mHealth program targeting adult smokers who are ambivalent about quitting. The core content consisted of a series of "personal experiments" similar to those tested as part of a counseling intervention in prior work, including brief cognitive or behavioral tasks designed to boost readiness for changing smoking behavior.

methodsWe conducted individual user interviews (N=3) to refine program content, and then conducted a one-arm pilot study (N=25) to assess user receptivity and the potential impact of the experiments on motivation and self-efficacy to quit or reduce smoking.

resultsIn user interviews, participants liked the concept of the personal experiments. Participants in the pilot study found a medium-fidelity prototype to be highly acceptable. After watching a brief orientation video that explained how the program works, most participants (80%, 20/25) indicated that it sounded interesting, primarily because it did not require any commitment to quit. All participants (100%, 25/25) completed all 7 experiments, including a 24-hour quit attempt, although not all were able to refrain from smoking for a full day based on qualitative feedback on the experiment. The mean rating of usefulness of the overall program was 4.12 (SD 1.09) out of 5, and the average rating of the difficulty of the experiments was 2.16 (SD 1.18) out of 5. At the last assessment point, 92% (23/25) of the participants indicated that they were more interested in either quitting or cutting back than when they began the program, and 72% (18/25) said that if the program had included a free trial of nicotine replacement therapy, they would have used it to try to quit smoking.

conclusionsThis formative work confirmed that ambivalent smokers are willing to use and will remain engaged with an mHealth intervention that employs the novel concept of personal experiments to enhance their motivation for and ability to quit smoking. The addition of action-oriented treatment (self-help and free nicotine replacement therapy, quitline referral) could further support users' efforts to stop smoking and remain quit.

Indexed as

cessationdevelopmentformativeinterventionmHealthmotivationnicotinesmartphonesmokingtobacco

Identifiers

PMID32852278
PMCPMC7484775
OpenAlexW3047170673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.