ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2020
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias risk: Comparing users of non-selective and M3-selective bladder antimuscarinic drugs.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of Recent Pharmacoepidemiologic Post-Market Safety Studies Through the Lens of the Estimand Framework.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Review
- The Effectiveness in Activating M-Type KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The cognitive effect of anticholinergics for patients with overactive bladder.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBladder antimuscarinic (BAM) drug use is associated with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). It is hypothesized that BAMs with non-selective receptor binding may increase ADRD risk more than M3-selective BAMs. This study compared ADRD risk for users of non-selective and M3-selective BAMs and examines ADRD risk associated with overall BAM use.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of Medicare claims for 71 688 individuals who used BAM drugs during 2007-2009 without an ADRD diagnosis. We compared ADRD incidence (2011-2016) between non-selective BAM users (fesoterodine, flavoxate, oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium) and M3-selective BAM users (darifenacin, solifenacin). Logistic regressions compared individuals using target drugs in the same category of total standardized daily doses (TSDD) as a standardized measure of drug exposure, and adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, healthcare utilization, other medication use, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Secondary analyses compared ADRD risk associated with different doses of BAMs overall.
resultsNon-selective BAM use (compared to M3-selective) was not significantly associated with ADRD incidence. Odds ratios for non-selective use were 0.97 (CI: 0.89-1.04) for 1-364 TSDD, 0.94 (CI: 0.83-1.06) for 365-729, 1.00 (CI: 0.87-1.16) for 730-1094, and 1.03 (CI: 0.88-1.20) for >1094. Higher TSDD of BAMs overall (combining both non-selective and M3-selective BAMs), when compared to 1-364 TSDD, were associated with increased ADRD incidence (OR = 1.05 (CI: 0.99-1.10) for 365-729, OR = 1.11 (CI: 1.05-1.17) for 730-1094, and OR = 1.10 (CI: 1.04-1.15) for >1094).
conclusionsNon-selective and M3-selective BAM users had similar odds of ADRD incidence, and BAM use overall was significantly associated with ADRD incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.