ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2020
Influence of the pandemic dissemination of COVID-19 on facial rejuvenation: A survey of Twitter.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Infection on the Safety and Efficacy of Aesthetic Injections: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Trends in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery Post COVID-19 Pandemic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Impact of Mask-Wearing on Public Attitudes, Perceptions, and Interest in Rhinoplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Investigating the Influencing Factors and Correlation Between Popularity and Emotion of Public Opinion During Disasters: Evidence from the "7.20" Rainstorm in China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Facial Rejuvenation: A Global Trend of Dermatological Procedures in the Last Decade.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient Interest in Facial Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- Changes in purchasing patterns in the beauty market due to Post-COVID-19: Literature review.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021Review
- Interest in aesthetics during COVID-19 pandemic: A Google trends analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021Article
- Influence of the pandemic dissemination of COVID-19 on facial rejuvenation: A survey of Twitter.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the pandemic dissemination of COVID-19, attitude and sentiment surrounding facial rejuvenation have evolved rapidly.
aimsThe purpose of this study was to understanding the impact of pandemic on the attitude of people toward facial skin rejuvenation.
methodsTwitter data related to facial rejuvenation were collected from January 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020. Sentiment analysis, frequency analysis, and word cloud were performed to analyze the data. Statistical analysis included two-tailed t tests and chi-square tests.
resultsIn the post-declaration, the number of tweets about facial rejuvenation increased significantly, and the search volume in Google Trends decreased. Negative public emotions increased, but positive emotions still dominate. The words frequency of "discounts" and "purchase" decreased. The dominant words in word cloud were "Botox," "facelift," "hyaluronic," and "skin."
conclusionThe public has a positive attitude toward facial rejuvenation during the pandemic. In particular, minimally invasive procedures dominate the mainstream, such as "Botox," "Hyaluronic acid," and "PRP." The practitioners could understand the change of the public interest in facial rejuvenation in time and decide what to focus on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.