Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32852142›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2020

Effectiveness and influencing factors of online education for caregivers of patients with eating disorders during COVID-19 pandemic in China.

Lei Guo, Mengting Wu, Zhuoying Zhu, Lei Zhang, Sufang Peng, Wei Li, Han Chen, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Jue Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Anorexia nervosa: COVID-19 pandemic period (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lei GuoShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-9604
Mengting WuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhuoying ZhuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lei ZhangShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sufang PengShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei LiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Han ChenShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fernando Fernández-ArandaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge-IDIBELL and CIBEROBN, Barcelona, Spain.
Jue ChenShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNBellvitge University Hospital · ES

Funding

Clinical Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shanghai Hospital Development Center: Grant/Award Number: SHDC12019129National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771461the grants from Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 2019ZB0201Xuhui District Health and Family Planning Commission Important Disease Joint Research Project XHLHGG201808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goals were twofold: To estimate the depression and anxiety levels among caregivers of patients with eating disorders (ED) in China during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with a control group, and to assess whether an online education program was effective in decreasing the anxiety and depression of the caregivers of patients with ED, and associated factors.

methodCaregivers of patients with ED (n = 254) and a comparison group of non-ED caregivers (N = 254) were recruited at baseline. Additionally, caregivers of patients with ED were invited into a free 4-week online education program, with an additional online group as support. Depression and anxiety levels were assessed at baseline and after the intervention.

resultsCaregivers of patients with ED showed significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety than the comparison group of non-ED caregivers. The online education program showed no significant effect on decreasing depression and anxiety levels of caregivers of patients with ED overall. Caregivers who had older loved ones and not living with them were more likely to decrease their depression levels. Caregivers of patients with longer illness duration were less likely to decrease their anxiety levels. DISCUSSION: These results showed that caregivers of ED patients suffered more serious psychological distress during the pandemic. A more structured and intensive online intervention with a limited number of participants might be required to address caregivers' distress in post-COVID-19 China.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionPandemicsAdultAnxietyCaregiversCase-Control StudiesChinaCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationcaregiversCOVID-19eating disordersonline intervention

Identifiers

PMID32852142
PMCPMC7461399
OpenAlexW3081380638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.