Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32851912›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular structure & dynamics2021

Rajan Rolta, Rohitash Yadav, Deeksha Salaria, Shubham Trivedi, Mohammad Imran, Anuradha Sourirajan, David J Baumler, Kamal Dev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Study of andrographolide bioactivity againstFrontiers in chemistry · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Antibacterial Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rajan RoltaFaculty of Applied sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Rohitash YadavDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Deeksha SalariaFaculty of Applied sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Shubham TrivediDepartment of Bioengineering, Integral University Lucknow, India.
Mohammad ImranDepartment of Pharmacology, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia.
Anuradha SourirajanFaculty of Applied sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Himachal Pradesh, India.
David J BaumlerDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Kamal DevFaculty of Applied sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Shoolini University · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences RishikeshIntegral University · INShaqra University · SAUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is no specific treatment to cure COVID-19. Many medicinal plants have antiviral, antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, wound healing etc. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to screen for potent inhibitors of N-terminal domain (NTD) of nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. The structure of NTD of RNA binding domain of nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of SARS coronavirus 2 was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB 6VYO) and the structures of 100 different phytocompounds were retrieved from Pubchem. The receptor protein and ligands were prepared using Schrodinger's Protein Preparation Wizard. Molecular docking was done by using the Schrodinger's maestro 12.0 software. Drug likeness and toxicity of active phytocompounds was predicted by using Swiss adme, admetSAR and protox II online servers. Molecular dynamic simulation of the best three protein- ligand complexes (alizarin, aloe-emodin and anthrarufin) was performed to study the interaction stability. We have identified three potential active sites (named as A, B, C) on receptor protein for efficient binding of the phytocompounds. We found that, among 100 phytocompounds, emodin, aloe-emodin, anthrarufin, alizarine, and dantron of

Indexed as

COVID-19Plants, MedicinalHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhosphoproteinsPhosphoproteinsActive site prediction and MD simulationantiviral and toxicityCOVID-19Molecular dockingPhytocompoundsRNA binding domain of nucleocapsid phosphoprotein

Identifiers

PMID32851912
PMCPMC7484575
OpenAlexW3080870377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.