ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021
A retrospective physiological noise correction method for oscillating steady-state imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Physiological Signal Removal on Resting-State Functional MRI Metrics.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOscillating steady-state imaging (OSSI) is an SNR-efficient steady-state sequence with
methodsA retrospective denoising approach was developed that leverages the unique signal properties of OSSI to perform denoising without a manually specified noise region of interest and works with both voxel timecourses (oscillating steady-state correction [OSSCOR]) or FID timecourses (F-OSSCOR). Simulations were performed to estimate the number of principal components optimal for denoising. In vivo experiments at 3 T field strength were conducted to compare the performance of proposed methods against a standard principal component analysis-based method, measured using mean t score within an region of interest, number of activations, and mean temporal SNR.
resultsCorrection using OSSCOR was significantly better than the standard method in all metrics. Correction using F-OSSCOR was not significantly different from the standard method using an equal number of principal components. Increasing the number of OSSCOR principal components decreased activation strength and increased the number of suspected false positives. However, increasing the number of principal components in F-OSSCOR increased activation strength with little to no increase in false activation.
conclusionBoth OSSCOR and F-OSSCOR substantially reduce physiological noise components and increase temporal SNR, improving the functional results of task-based OSSI functional experiments. F-OSSCOR demonstrates a proof of concept utilization of coil-localized FID signal information for physiological noise correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.