ArticleImmunology2020
Retraction.
Article in Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retraction: Emoto, M., Shimizu, T., Koike, H., Yoshizawa, I., Hurwitz, R., Kaufmann, S.H.E. and Emoto, Y. (2010), Dissociated expression of natural killer 1.1 and T-cell receptor by invariant natural killer T cells after interleukin-12 receptor and T-cell receptor signalling. Immunology, 129: 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03148.x The above article, published online on 08 December 2009 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the Editor-in-Chief of Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed following an investigation carried out by Gunma University (http://www.gunma-u.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/chosakekka29.pdf). The investigation was unable to determine the validity of the images for which Professor Emoto, the article's corresponding author, was responsible. As a result, the journal has made the decision to retract the article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.