Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32851644›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2020

The Spectrum of Response to Erenumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine and Subgroup Analysis of Patients Achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% Response.

Gregor Broessner, Uwe Reuter, Jo H Bonner, David W Dodick, Yngve Hallström, Hernan Picard, Feng Zhang, Robert A Lenz, Jan Klatt, Daniel D Mikol

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02456740 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Migraine Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02456740 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Migraine Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled955ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Gregor BroessnerDepartment of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Uwe ReuterDepartment of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jo H BonnerMercy Clinic Neurology and Headache Centre, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
David W DodickDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Yngve HallströmNeuro Center, St Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hernan PicardAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Feng ZhangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Robert A LenzAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Jan KlattNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel D MikolAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMercy Clinic Neurology · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHSaint Göran Hospital · SE

Funding

Amgen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy of erenumab at the ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) response thresholds, using data from the 6-month double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention (STRIVE) pivotal clinical trial.

methodsEnrolled patients with episodic migraine (EM; ≥4 MMD and <15 monthly headache days) were randomized (1:1:1) to erenumab 70 mg (n = 312), erenumab 140 mg (n = 318), or placebo (n = 316) once monthly. We determined the proportions of patients with ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% reduction in MMD over the last 3 months of the STRIVE DBTP (months 4 through 6) and conducted post hoc analyses to contextualize the treatment benefit in patient subgroups achieving, and not achieving, these response thresholds. Outcome measures included changes in MMD, acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD), and patient-reported outcomes.

resultsThe proportions of patients with a reduction in MMD from baseline were greater for erenumab than for placebo at all response thresholds. As previously reported for the ≥50% response threshold, 135/312 (43.3%) of patients on erenumab 70 mg and 159/318 (50.0%) on erenumab 140 mg responded, vs 84/316 (26.6%) for placebo. At months 4 through 6, 65/312 (20.8%) and 70/318 (22.0%) of those on erenumab 70 mg and erenumab 140 mg, respectively, achieved ≥75% reductions vs 25/316 (7.9%) on placebo. A reduction of 100% response, which required no migraine days over 3 consecutive months based on observed data, was achieved by 10/312 (3.2%) of patients treated with erenumab 70 mg and 16/318 (5.0%) for erenumab 140 mg, vs 9/316 (2.8%) for placebo. At all response thresholds, responders achieved numerically greater reductions in mean MMD and MSMD, and greater improvements in disability than did the overall population; importantly, these remarkable responses were noted early. Meanwhile, 60/312 (19.2%) and 53/318 (16.7%) patients on erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively, had no reduction in MMD from baseline in months 4 through 6, compared with 104/316 (32.9%) patients on placebo.

conclusionsThe responses at the ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% thresholds provide context for establishing realistic patient and physician expectations regarding the magnitude of treatment benefit that may be achieved by patients with EM responding to erenumab (STRIVE, NCT02456740).

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizederenumabefficacyepisodic migraineerenumabresponder thresholdsSTRIVE double-blind treatment phase

Identifiers

PMID32851644
PMCPMC7590156
OpenAlexW3080956141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.