ArticleJournal of applied genetics2020
Characterizing the fecal bacteria and archaea community of heifers and lactating cows through 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiome and resistome of the European bison (Bison bonasus).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Oral Administration ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Evidence for modulation of the fecal microbiota profile by diet in lactating buffalo.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Bovine Lymphocyte Intestinal Retention Defect (BLIRD): a novel recessive immunogenetic disorder in Holstein cattle.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Article
- The bacterial faecal microbiota shifts during the transition period in dairy cows.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Changes in fecal microbiota of dairy cows with and without endometritis.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Microbiome analysis reveals gut bacterial alterations in adult Tibetan pigs with diarrhea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of Age in Fecal Microbiota and Correlations with Blood Parameters in Genetic Nucleus of Cattle.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Fecal and vaginal microbiota of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pregnant elk challenged withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Unlocking gut microbiota potential of dairy cows in varied environmental conditions using shotgun metagenomic approach.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Effect of a High-Starch or a High-Fat Diet on the Milk Performance, Apparent Nutrient Digestibility, Hindgut Fermentation Parameters and Microbiota of Lactating Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Changes in Milk Microorganisms in the First Two Months of Lactation of Primiparous and Multiparous Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- A global phylogenomic and metabolic reconstruction of the large intestine bacterial community of domesticated cattle.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Fecal Microbiome Features Associated with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Carriage in Dairy Heifers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Characterization of gut microbiota dysbiosis of diarrheic adult yaks through 16S rRNA gene sequences.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Gut Microbiota Profiles in Dairy Cattle from Highland and Coastal Regions Using Shotgun Metagenomic Approach.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Exploration and comparison of bacterial communities present in bovine faeces, milk and blood using 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing.PloS one · 2022Article
- Full-Length SSU rRNA Gene Sequencing Allows Species-Level Detection of Bacteria, Archaea, and Yeasts Present in Milk.Microorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the fecal bacteria and archaea composition of Holstein-Friesian and Simmental heifers and lactating cows, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Bacteria and archaea communities were characterized and compared between heifers and cows of the same breed. Two breeds from different farms were considered, just to speculate about the conservation of the microbiome differences between cows and heifers that undergo different management conditions. The two breeds were from two different herds. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in all experimental groups. Alpha- and beta-diversity metrics showed significant differences between heifers and cows within the same breed, supported by principal coordinate analysis. The analysis of Holstein-Friesian fecal microbiome composition revealed 3 different bacteria families, 2 genera, and 2 species that differed between heifers and cows; on the other hand, Simmental heifers and cows differed only for one bacteria family, one archaeal genus, and one bacteria species. Results of the present study suggest that fecal communities of heifers and cows are different, and that fecal microbiome is maintained across experimental groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.