Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32851553›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2021

She Screened Positive for Depression at the First Prenatal Visit, What Really Happens Next?

Ellen J Tourtelot, Jasmine R Davis, Nicole Trabold, Devyani K Shah, Ellen Poleshuck

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellen J TourtelotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA. Ellen_tourtelot@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-8880
Jasmine R DavisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Nicole TraboldDepartment of Behavioral Health Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, College of Health Science and Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Devyani K ShahDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Ellen PoleshuckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this mixed-methods study was to evaluate how providers in a busy urban practice with universal depression screening and co-located behavioral health services responded to positive screens and to explore patient expectations and attitudes towards positive screens. Semi-structured interviews of 20 pregnant women were conducted within 10 days of a positive depression screen or endorsement of suicidal ideation on the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale and health record documentation was reviewed. Qualitative data were entered into a meta-matrix and cross-case analysis was used to reduce the data and determine prominent patterns and themes. Most participants reported discussing their mood with their provider, appreciated the discussion and were satisfied with the plan. Most had documentation of a discussion by their provider. Only 4 of 9 participants who endorsed thoughts of self-harm had documentation of a discussion regarding their response. While nearly all women were recommended for psychotherapy, most did not receive it. Participants expected follow-up but few had discussion of mood documented at the second prenatal visit, independent of seeing the same provider. Co-located behavioral health did not guarantee that services were utilized. There is a need to incorporate tested integrated care approaches to improve assessments and linkage to effective depression treatment.

Indexed as

DepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSuicidal IdeationSurveys and QuestionnairesDepression treatment engagementIntegrated carePerinatal depressionPositive depression screenSuicide assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.