ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2021
She Screened Positive for Depression at the First Prenatal Visit, What Really Happens Next?
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of postpartum psychosis resulting in infanticide: missed opportunities in screening, diagnosis, and treatment.Archives of women's mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Randomized trial of promoting first relationships for new mothers who received community mental health services in pregnancy.Developmental psychology · 2021Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this mixed-methods study was to evaluate how providers in a busy urban practice with universal depression screening and co-located behavioral health services responded to positive screens and to explore patient expectations and attitudes towards positive screens. Semi-structured interviews of 20 pregnant women were conducted within 10 days of a positive depression screen or endorsement of suicidal ideation on the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale and health record documentation was reviewed. Qualitative data were entered into a meta-matrix and cross-case analysis was used to reduce the data and determine prominent patterns and themes. Most participants reported discussing their mood with their provider, appreciated the discussion and were satisfied with the plan. Most had documentation of a discussion by their provider. Only 4 of 9 participants who endorsed thoughts of self-harm had documentation of a discussion regarding their response. While nearly all women were recommended for psychotherapy, most did not receive it. Participants expected follow-up but few had discussion of mood documented at the second prenatal visit, independent of seeing the same provider. Co-located behavioral health did not guarantee that services were utilized. There is a need to incorporate tested integrated care approaches to improve assessments and linkage to effective depression treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32851553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.