Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32851531›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2020

Effectiveness of connective tissue graft substitutes for the treatment of gingival recessions compared with coronally advanced flap: a network meta-analysis.

Vittorio Moraschini, Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia, Alexandra Tavares Dias, Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto, Anton Sculean, Jamil Awad Shibli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06508476 (The Efficacy of Amnion Chorion Allograft in Management of Type 1 Gingival Recession.), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06508476 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Amnion Chorion Allograft in Management of Type 1 Gingival Recession. (Randomized Clinical Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsGingival Recession, LocalizedArmsAmnion Chorion membrane, connective tissue graft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vittorio MoraschiniDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Research Division, School of Dentistry, Veiga de Almeida University, Rua Ibituruna, 108, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Cep: 20271-020, Brazil. vitt.mf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-394X
Monica Diuana Calasans-MaiaDepartment of Oral Surgery, Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alexandra Tavares DiasDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Research Division, School of Dentistry, Veiga de Almeida University, Rua Ibituruna, 108, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Cep: 20271-020, Brazil.
Márcio de Carvalho FormigaDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, University of Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suelen Cristina SartorettoDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Research Division, School of Dentistry, Veiga de Almeida University, Rua Ibituruna, 108, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Cep: 20271-020, Brazil.
Anton SculeanDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jamil Awad ShibliDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, University of Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to conduct a network comparison of the clinical effect of connective tissue graft (CTG) substitutes on the treatment of gingival recessions using coronally advanced flap. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic search without language or dates restrictions was performed in five databases and in Grey literature for articles published until May, 2020. The eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the clinical outcomes of CTG substitutes when compared with coronally advanced flap (CAF) for the treatment of Miller class I and II (Cairo RT I) gingival recessions. A pairwise and network meta-analysis were conducted for each periodontal parameters to assess and compare the outcomes among different treatment arms for the primary and secondary outcomes. This systematic review (SR) was registered in INPLASY under number INPLASY202060075.

resultsTwenty-seven studies were included in the present SR. All analyzed CTG substitutes showed superior results when comparing with CAF alone for all periodontal parameters. However, when compared in a network, the acellular dermal matrix (ADM) demonstrated the best treatment ranking of probability results, followed by platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), enamel matrix derivative (EMD), and xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) for root coverage (RC).

conclusionThis SR observed that the association of biomaterials increases the effectiveness of RC in comparison with CAF alone. Based on the treatment ranking, although all the biomaterials analyzed showed a positive effect for RC, the ADM demonstrated the best results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To know the effectiveness of CTG substitutes for the treatment of gingival recessions.

Indexed as

Gingival RecessionConnective TissueGingivaHumansTooth RootTreatment OutcomeBiomaterialsConnective tissue graftGingival recessionRoot coverage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.