ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous MRI-guided biopsy of solid renal masses: single-center results after 4.5 years.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Yield of Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy Immediately After Cryoablation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal sinus masses: diagnostic yield, safety, and clinical impact.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance for Percutaneous Needle Intervention.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2024Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging-guided renal biopsy shows high safety and diagnostic yield: a tertiary cancer center experience.European radiology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy before cryoablation for small-sized renal cell carcinoma.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Percutaneous Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Coaxial Cutting Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
- MRI-guided interventional procedures: current use and future potentials.European radiology · 2023Article
- Molecular Imaging Diagnosis of Renal Cancer UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Hemothorax After a Renal Biopsy With Ablation, a Rare Complication: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo retrospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy and complications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM).
methodsElectronic records of all consecutive patients undergoing MRI-guided biopsy of solid RM (using free-breathing T2-BLADE and BEAT-IRTTT sequences) between April 2014 and October 2018 were reviewed; 101 patients (69 men, 32 women; median age 68 years; range 32-76) were included. Patient and RM characteristics, procedural details/complications, pathologic diagnosis, and clinical management were recorded. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on an intention-to-diagnose basis. Diagnostic yield was also evaluated. Multi-variable analysis was performed for variables with p < .20, including patient age/sex; RM size/location/contact with vascular pedicle, RENAL score, number and total length of biopsy samples, and biopsy tract embolization, to determine factors associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, and complications.
resultsMedian RM size was 2.4 cm (range 1-8.4 cm). There were 86 (85%; 95%CI 77-91%) diagnostic and 15 (15%; 95%CI 9-23%) non-diagnostic samples; 6/15 (40%) non-diagnostic biopsies were repeated with 50% malignancy rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 96% (95%CI 89-99%), 100% (95%CI 77-100%), 100% (95%CI 95-100%), 82% (95%CI 57-96%), and 97% (95%CI 90-99%), respectively. Primary and secondary diagnostic yields were 85% (95%CI 77-91%) and 91% (95%CI 84-96%), respectively. Seven (7%; 95%CI 1-10%) complications were observed. No tested variables were associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, or complications.
conclusionsMRI-guided biopsy of solid RM is associated with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rate. The technique might be helpful for inaccessible tumors. KEY POINTS: • MRI-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM) appears safe, with a low rate of minor self-limiting hemorrhagic complications. • Diagnostic accuracy and primary/secondary diagnostic yield are high and appear similar to reported estimates for US- and CT-guided RM biopsy. • MRI guidance may be particularly useful for RM with poor conspicuity on US and CT, for relatively inaccessible tumors (e.g., tumors requiring double-oblique steep-angled approaches), and for young patients or those with renal failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.