Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32851448›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous MRI-guided biopsy of solid renal masses: single-center results after 4.5 years.

Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Pierre De Marini, Pierre Auloge, Loic Leclerc, Thibault Tricard, Veronique Linder, Marion Jost, Nitin Ramamurthy, Hervé Lang, Julien Garnon and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal sinus masses: diagnostic yield, safety, and clinical impact.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance for Percutaneous Needle Intervention.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Imaging Diagnosis of Renal Cancer UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto Luigi CazzatoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France. roberto-luigi.cazzato@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-558X
Pierre De MariniDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Pierre AulogeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Loic LeclercDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Thibault TricardDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Veronique LinderDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Marion JostDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Nitin RamamurthyDepartment of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Ln, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Hervé LangDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Julien GarnonDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Afshin GangiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo retrospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy and complications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM).

methodsElectronic records of all consecutive patients undergoing MRI-guided biopsy of solid RM (using free-breathing T2-BLADE and BEAT-IRTTT sequences) between April 2014 and October 2018 were reviewed; 101 patients (69 men, 32 women; median age 68 years; range 32-76) were included. Patient and RM characteristics, procedural details/complications, pathologic diagnosis, and clinical management were recorded. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on an intention-to-diagnose basis. Diagnostic yield was also evaluated. Multi-variable analysis was performed for variables with p < .20, including patient age/sex; RM size/location/contact with vascular pedicle, RENAL score, number and total length of biopsy samples, and biopsy tract embolization, to determine factors associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, and complications.

resultsMedian RM size was 2.4 cm (range 1-8.4 cm). There were 86 (85%; 95%CI 77-91%) diagnostic and 15 (15%; 95%CI 9-23%) non-diagnostic samples; 6/15 (40%) non-diagnostic biopsies were repeated with 50% malignancy rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 96% (95%CI 89-99%), 100% (95%CI 77-100%), 100% (95%CI 95-100%), 82% (95%CI 57-96%), and 97% (95%CI 90-99%), respectively. Primary and secondary diagnostic yields were 85% (95%CI 77-91%) and 91% (95%CI 84-96%), respectively. Seven (7%; 95%CI 1-10%) complications were observed. No tested variables were associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, or complications.

conclusionsMRI-guided biopsy of solid RM is associated with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rate. The technique might be helpful for inaccessible tumors. KEY POINTS: • MRI-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM) appears safe, with a low rate of minor self-limiting hemorrhagic complications. • Diagnostic accuracy and primary/secondary diagnostic yield are high and appear similar to reported estimates for US- and CT-guided RM biopsy. • MRI guidance may be particularly useful for RM with poor conspicuity on US and CT, for relatively inaccessible tumors (e.g., tumors requiring double-oblique steep-angled approaches), and for young patients or those with renal failure.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansKidneyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiopsyKidneyMR-guided interventional proceduresNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32851448
OpenAlexW3080228459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.