ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
First-Degree Relatives Screening of Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Effectiveness and Feasibility in Pediatric Cardiology Daily Practice.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family screening for bicuspid aortic valve and aortic dilatation: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2023Pooled it
- Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease-Associated Aortopathy in Pediatric Subjects-From Traditional Assessment to Current Advances and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease. Since heritability is suspected, actual guidelines recommend to perform an echocardiographic assessment for first-degree relatives (FDR) of patient with BAV. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and the feasibility of the current guidelines for the screening of FDR of patient with BAV in a pediatric cardiology daily practice. Consecutive patients with BAV and their FDR were prospectively included from January 2015 to March 2018 at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Laval, Quebec City (Canada). Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. A total of 713 FDR of 213 consecutives index cases [median age: 11 (6-20) years] were studied. Up to 32 (6.6%) FDR had a BAV and 26 (5.4%) had an aortic valve dysfunction. A total of 14 (2.9%) FDR had an ascending aorta dilatation according to Z-score including 6 (1.2%) patients with an ascending aorta ≥ 45 mm. No statistically significant differences regarding BAV, aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dilatation prevalence were identified between generations. Screening was done in 482 (67.6%), prescribed but not done in 134 (19%), not prescribed in 92 (13%) and declined in 5 (1%) FDR. The prevalence of BAV in FDR was similar to prospective adult studies and supports actual guidelines in pediatric cardiology practice. Ascending aorta dilatation was rare in our young population. Exhaustiveness and additional burden to implement current guidelines remain a challenge in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.