ReviewPediatric investigation2019
Quality improvement in pediatric intensive care: A systematic review of the literature.
Review in Pediatric investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2024Pooled it
- How to Evaluate a Regional Telemedical Care Network Focusing on Critically Ill Children? Results from the Consensus-Based Development of an Evaluation Design.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishing a paediatric critical care core quality measure set using a multistakeholder, consensus-driven process.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Effects of specialized nursing intervention based on quantitative assessment strategy on psychological state and quality of life of patients with senile dementia.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2023Article
- Effect of High-Quality Nursing Intervention on the Quality of Life and Psychological State of Tumor Patients Undergoing First Chemotherapy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Quality improvement in pediatric intensive care: A systematic review of the literature.Pediatric investigation · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceMeasuring and improving performance is an essential component of any high-risk industry, including intensive care medicine. We undertook this systematic review to describe the current state of quality improvement efforts in pediatric intensive care medicine.
objectiveTo evaluate the quality and rigor of all published literature on quality improvement efforts in the pediatric intensive care unit in the current era.
methodsWe conducted a literature search on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for studies that met two broad inclusion criteria: 1) the terms "pediatric critical care" and "quality improvement" and 2) they were completed in the past ten years. In the initial search, we also included academic and professional societies or organizations devoted to providing resources on quality improvement in intensive care medicine. We excluded studies that examined quality improvement processes exclusively for neonatal or adult patients receiving intensive care.
resultsForty-nine of 332 identified articles were selected for final review by two reviewers who independently rated the quality of the methodology and rigor of the evidence reported for each study. Of these, 23 studies targeted structural issues, 14 studies targeted process issues, and 12 targeted an outcome as the focus of the intensive care quality improvement effort.
interpretationOur review of the published literature on quality improvement efforts in the pediatric intensive care unit in the current era found that 85% of studies were limited in methodology or analysis. Fifteen high-quality studies are reported here and serve as helpful examples of rigorous research methodology in this domain going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.