Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32851115›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2020

Three-Dimensional Printing and Electrospinning Dual-Scale Polycaprolactone Scaffolds with Low-Density and Oriented Fibers to Promote Cell Alignment.

Cian Vyas, Gokhan Ates, Enes Aslan, Jack Hart, Boyang Huang, Paulo Bartolo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Three-Dimensional Printed Cellulose for Wound Dressing Applications.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cian VyasDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gokhan AtesDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Enes AslanDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jack HartDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Boyang HuangDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Paulo BartoloDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex and hierarchically functionalized scaffolds composed of micro- and nanoscale structures are a key goal in tissue engineering. The combination of three-dimensional (3D) printing and electrospinning enables the fabrication of these multiscale structures. This study presents a polycaprolactone 3D-printed and electrospun scaffold with multiple mesh layers and fiber densities. The results show successful fabrication of a dual-scale scaffold with the 3D-printed scaffold acting as a gap collector with the printed microfibers as the electrodes and the pores a series of insulating gaps resulting in aligned nanofibers. The electrospun fibers are highly aligned perpendicular to the direction of the printed fiber and form aligned meshes within the pores of the scaffold. Mechanical testing showed no significant difference between the number of mesh layers whereas the hydrophobicity of the scaffold increased with increasing fiber density. Biological results indicate that increasing the number of mesh layers improves cell proliferation, migration, and adhesion. The aligned nanofibers within the microscale pores allowed enhanced cell bridging and cell alignment that was not observed in the 3D-printed only scaffold. These results demonstrate a facile method of incorporating low-density and aligned fibers within a 3D-printed scaffold that is a promising development in multiscale hierarchical scaffolds where alignment of cells can be desirable.

Indexed as

3D printingbiomaterialselectrospinningscaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32851115
PMCPMC7313635
OpenAlexW3016503898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.