Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850966›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2020

Intermolecular Communication in

Inam Ul Haq, Peter Müller, Sabine Brantl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigation of sRNA-mRNA Interactions in Bacillus subtilis In Vivo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Small proteins in Gram-positive bacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  11. Specific and Global RNA Regulators inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. An RNA-centric global view ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Moonlighting inMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  14. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inam Ul HaqMatthias-Schleiden-Institut, AG Bakteriengenetik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Peter MüllerMatthias-Schleiden-Institut, AG Bakteriengenetik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sabine BrantlMatthias-Schleiden-Institut, AG Bakteriengenetik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bacterial cells we find a variety of interacting macromolecules, among them RNAs and proteins. Not only small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), but also small proteins have been increasingly recognized as regulators of bacterial gene expression. An average bacterial genome encodes between 200 and 300 sRNAs, but an unknown number of small proteins. sRNAs can be

Indexed as

antiterminatorsBacillus subtilisRNA chaperonessmall proteinssmall regulatory RNAsRNAT-box riboswitchtype I toxin-antitoxin system

Identifiers

PMID32850966
PMCPMC7430163
OpenAlexW3048126891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.