Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850944›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2020

Intraoperative Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Corinna Ongaigui, Juan Fiorda-Diaz, Olufunke Dada, Ana Mavarez-Martinez, Marco Echeverria-Villalobos, Sergio D Bergese

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corinna OngaiguiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Juan Fiorda-DiazDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Olufunke DadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Ana Mavarez-MartinezDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Marco Echeverria-VillalobosDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Sergio D BergeseDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid management has been widely recognized as an important component of the perioperative care in patients undergoing major procedures including spine surgeries. Patient- and surgery-related factors such as age, length of the surgery, massive intraoperative blood loss, and prone positioning, may impact the intraoperative administration of fluids. In addition, the type of fluid administered may also affect post-operative outcomes. Published literature describing intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing major spine surgeries is limited and remains controversial. Therefore, we reviewed current literature on intraoperative fluid management and its association with post-operative complications in spine surgery.

Indexed as

fluid managementfluid therapyperioperative careprone positionspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID32850944
PMCPMC7403195
OpenAlexW3045516360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.