Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850745›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

A New Method for CTC Images Recognition Based on Machine Learning.

Binsheng He, Qingqing Lu, Jidong Lang, Hai Yu, Chao Peng, Pingping Bing, Shijun Li, Qiliang Zhou, Yuebin Liang, Geng Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding TCR T cell knockout behavior using interpretable machine learning.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Binsheng HeAcademician Workstation, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.
Qingqing LuGeneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Jidong LangGeneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Hai YuGeneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Chao PengGeneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Pingping BingAcademician Workstation, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.
Shijun LiDepartment of Pathology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China.
Qiliang ZhouAcademician Workstation, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.
Yuebin LiangGeneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Geng TianGeneis (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) derived from primary tumors and/or metastatic tumors are markers for tumor prognosis, and can also be used to monitor therapeutic efficacy and tumor recurrence. Circulating tumor cells enrichment and screening can be automated, but the final counting of CTCs currently requires manual intervention. This not only requires the participation of experienced pathologists, but also easily causes artificial misjudgment. Medical image recognition based on machine learning can effectively reduce the workload and improve the level of automation. So, we use machine learning to identify CTCs. First, we collected the CTC test results of 600 patients. After immunofluorescence staining, each picture presented a positive CTC cell nucleus and several negative controls. The images of CTCs were then segmented by image denoising, image filtering, edge detection, image expansion and contraction techniques using python's openCV scheme. Subsequently, traditional image recognition methods and machine learning were used to identify CTCs. Machine learning algorithms are implemented using convolutional neural network deep learning networks for training. We took 2300 cells from 600 patients for training and testing. About 1300 cells were used for training and the others were used for testing. The sensitivity and specificity of recognition reached 90.3 and 91.3%, respectively. We will further revise our models, hoping to achieve a higher sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cells (CTCs)CNN networkimage segmentationimFISHmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID32850745
PMCPMC7423836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.