ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
Transportability of Conclusions From Confined Field Trials: A Case Study Using the Virus Resistant Transgenic Bean Developed in Brazil.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetically modified microorganisms for agricultural use: an opportunity for the advancement of risk assessment criteria in Argentina.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Experiences, learnings and perspectives in the regulation of agricultural biotechnology: the view from Argentina.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Best practices for acceptability of GM crops field trials conclusions: lessons for Africa.GM crops & food · 2024Review
- Paraguay's approach to biotechnology governance: a comprehensive guide.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Improving regulatory efficiency for biotechnology products.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Introduction and scientific justification of data transportability for confined field testing for the ERA of GM plants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- GEnZ explorer: a tool for visualizing agroclimate to inform research and regulatory risk assessment.Transgenic research · 2023Article
- Update of Argentina's Regulatory Policies on the Environmental Risk Assessment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conceptual framework for Data Transportability, builds on the premise that well-designed studies conducted for the environmental and food/feed risk assessment of transgenic crops may be transportable across geographies. Beyond individual data, provided that certain criteria are met, the general conclusions of comparative assessments of a transgenic crop with its conventional counterpart would also be transportable. In spite of this, many regulatory agencies still require in-country field trials to complete risk assessments of transgenic crops. A sub-team from ILSI Argentina's (International Life Sciences Institute, Argentina. www.ilsi.org.ar) Biotechnology Working Group tested the applicability of the transportability concept to the case of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.