Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850697›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Hydrogels for Bioprinting: A Systematic Review of Hydrogels Synthesis, Bioprinting Parameters, and Bioprinted Structures Behavior.

Enrique Mancha Sánchez, J Carlos Gómez-Blanco, Esther López Nieto, Javier G Casado, Antonio Macías-García, María A Díaz Díez, Juan Pablo Carrasco-Amador, Diego Torrejón Martín, Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo, J Blas Pagador

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cell homing within endodontic hydrogels: A scoping review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. 3D Printing for Neural Repair: Bridging the Gap in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Enrique Mancha SánchezBioengineering and Health Technologies Unit, Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, Cáceres, Spain.
J Carlos Gómez-BlancoBioengineering and Health Technologies Unit, Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, Cáceres, Spain.
Esther López NietoStem Cells Unit, Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, Cáceres, Spain.
Javier G CasadoStem Cells Unit, Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, Cáceres, Spain.
Antonio Macías-GarcíaSchool of Industrial Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
María A Díaz DíezSchool of Industrial Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Juan Pablo Carrasco-AmadorSchool of Industrial Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Diego Torrejón MartínSchool of Industrial Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Francisco Miguel Sánchez-MargalloScientific Direction, Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, Cáceres, Spain.
J Blas PagadorBioengineering and Health Technologies Unit, Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre Jesús Usón, Cáceres, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, bioprinting is rapidly evolving and hydrogels are a key component for its success. In this sense, synthesis of hydrogels, as well as bioprinting process, and cross-linking of bioinks represent different challenges for the scientific community. A set of unified criteria and a common framework are missing, so multidisciplinary research teams might not efficiently share the advances and limitations of bioprinting. Although multiple combinations of materials and proportions have been used for several applications, it is still unclear the relationship between good printability of hydrogels and better medical/clinical behavior of bioprinted structures. For this reason, a PRISMA methodology was conducted in this review. Thus, 1,774 papers were retrieved from PUBMED, WOS, and SCOPUS databases. After selection, 118 papers were analyzed to extract information about materials, hydrogel synthesis, bioprinting process, and tests performed on bioprinted structures. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze materials used and their influence on the bioprinting parameters that ultimately generate tridimensional structures. Furthermore, a comparison of mechanical and cellular behavior of those bioprinted structures is presented. Finally, some conclusions and recommendations are exposed to improve reproducibility and facilitate a fair comparison of results.

Indexed as

bioinkbiomaterialbioprintinghydrogelsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32850697
PMCPMC7424022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.