Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850673›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2020

The Current Role of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials in the Sample Preparation Arena.

Edvaldo Vasconcelos Soares Maciel, Karen Mejía-Carmona, Marcela Jordan-Sinisterra, Luis Felipe da Silva, Deyber Arley Vargas Medina, Fernando Mauro Lanças

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edvaldo Vasconcelos Soares MacielLaboratory of Chromatography (CROMA), São Carlos Institute of Chemistry (IQSC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Karen Mejía-CarmonaLaboratory of Chromatography (CROMA), São Carlos Institute of Chemistry (IQSC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Marcela Jordan-SinisterraLaboratory of Chromatography (CROMA), São Carlos Institute of Chemistry (IQSC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Luis Felipe da SilvaLaboratory of Chromatography (CROMA), São Carlos Institute of Chemistry (IQSC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Deyber Arley Vargas MedinaLaboratory of Chromatography (CROMA), São Carlos Institute of Chemistry (IQSC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Fernando Mauro LançasLaboratory of Chromatography (CROMA), São Carlos Institute of Chemistry (IQSC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its discovery in 2004 by Novoselov et al., graphene has attracted increasing attention in the scientific community due to its excellent physical and chemical properties, such as thermal/mechanical resistance, electronic stability, high Young's modulus, and fast mobility of charged atoms. In addition, other remarkable characteristics support its use in analytical chemistry, especially as sorbent. For these reasons, graphene-based materials (GBMs) have been used as a promising material in sample preparation. Graphene and graphene oxide, owing to their excellent physical and chemical properties as a large surface area, good mechanical strength, thermal stability, and delocalized π-electrons, are ideal sorbents, especially for molecules containing aromatic rings. They have been used in several sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE), as well as in miniaturized modes as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in their different configurations. However, the reduced size and weight of graphene sheets can limit their use since they commonly aggregate to each other, causing clogging in high-pressure extractive devices. One way to overcome it and other drawbacks consists of covalently attaching the graphene sheets to support materials (e.g., silica, polymers, and magnetically modified supports). Also, graphene-based materials can be further chemically modified to favor some interactions with specific analytes, resulting in more efficient hybrid sorbents with higher selectivity for specific chemical classes. As a result of this wide variety of graphene-based sorbents, several studies have shown the current potential of applying GBMs in different fields such as food, biological, pharmaceutical, and environmental applications. Within such a context, this review will focus on the last five years of achievements in graphene-based materials for sample preparation techniques highlighting their synthesis, chemical structure, and potential application for the extraction of target analytes in different complex matrices.

Indexed as

cyclodextringraphenegraphene oxideionic liquidmagneticmolecularly-imprinted polymersample preparation

Identifiers

PMID32850673
PMCPMC7431689
OpenAlexW3048536871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.