ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2020
Enzyme-Responsive Nanoparticles for Anti-tumor Drug Delivery.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collagenase-mediated extracellular matrix targeting for enhanced drug penetration and therapeutic efficacy in nanoscale delivery systems for cancer therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- 4D nanoimaging-guided smart therapeutics: spatiotemporal control of disease microenvironments.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Preparation of Targeted Delivery Materials and Their Application in Animal Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Pyroptosis as a novel therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme: Mechanisms, molecular insights, and therapeutic potential.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Engineering Release at the Molecular Level: Role of Functional Groups in Polysaccharide-Based Drug Delivery.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Navigating toxicity in lung cancer immunotherapy: challenges and advances in Nano medicine drug delivery.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers as Next-Generation on-Demand Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy: Mechanistic Insights, Trigger Modalities, and Translational Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Renaissance of Traditional Mineral Drugs in Cancer: Advanced Delivery Strategies and Bioengineering Approaches.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Development and Optimization of Ionic Strength-Responsive Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles for Buccal Protein Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Matrix-Driven Modulation of Phenolic Profiles fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Polymer Nanoparticles in Medical Applications-Future Directions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle Strategies for Bone Metastasis Immunotherapy: Targeting, Immune Reprogramming and Combination Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle Clearance and New Horizons in Engineered Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Gold Nanoparticle-Based Precision Medicine Strategies for Glioblastoma: Current Biomedical Applications and Future Outlook.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smart nanoparticle delivery systems for curcumin: a targeted strategy to enhance anticancer efficacy and bioavailability.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Supramolecular Biomaterials for Cancer Theranostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advances in the applications of stimulus-responsive nanomedicines for anti-cancer therapy.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles in HIV treatment for improved drug delivery, clinical translation, and future direction.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Hepatotropic Nanomedicine and Targeted Nanocarriers for Liver Diseases and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past few decades have seen great progress in the exploration of nanoparticles (NPs) as novel tools for cancer treatments and diagnosis. Practical and reliable application of nanoparticle-based technology in clinical transformation remains nevertheless an ongoing challenge. The design, preparation, and evaluation of various smart NPs with specific physicochemical responses in tumor-related physiological conditions have been of great interests in both academic and clinical research. Of particular, smart enzyme-responsive nanoparticles can predictively and selectively react with specific enzymes expressed in tumor tissues, leading to targeted delivery of anti-tumor drugs, reduced systemic toxicity, and improved therapeutic effect. In addition, NPs interact with internal enzymes usually under mild conditions (low temperature, aqueous media, neutral or close to neutral pH) with high efficiency. In this review, recent advances in the past 5 years in enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for anti-tumor drug delivery are summarized and discussed. The following contents are divided based on the different action sites of enzymes toward NPs, notably hydrophobic core, cleavable/uncleavable linker, hydrophilic crown, and targeting ligand. Enzyme-engaged destruction of any component of these delicate nanoparticle structures could result in either targeting drug delivery or controlled drug release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.