Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850449›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

Significance of Extranodal Extension in Surgically Treated HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Carcinomas.

Anna Beltz, Stefanie Zimmer, Ioannis Michaelides, Katja Evert, Georgios Psychogios, Christopher Bohr, Julian Künzel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Upfront Neck Dissection for Treatment Selection and Improvement in Quality of Life as a Novel Treatment Paradigm for Deintensification in HPV+ OPSCC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna BeltzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Stefanie ZimmerInstitute of Pathology, Tissue Bank, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ioannis MichaelidesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Katja EvertInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Georgios PsychogiosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Christopher BohrDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Julian KünzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GRUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are the subject of numerous current studies, especially in view of the increasing incidence of tumors induced by human papillomavirus (HPV) and the latest changes to the TNM classification of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). In addition to HPV status, the presence of extranodal extension of lymph node metastases represents an important risk and prognostic factor, which has now been integrated into the staging algorithm of the eighth edition of TNM classification for HPV-negative OPSCC. In the past numerous studies had shown a lack of prognostic significance of extranodal extension in HPV-associated tumors. However, extranodal extension-as a possible risk factor even in HPV-positive OPSCC-remains an important subject of current studies, which are now particularly characterized by high numbers of cases. In this paper, diagnostic methods and the prognostic significance of extranodal extension in surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCC are presented and discussed based on relevant literature, and the results of current publications are summarized. Further development of diagnostic criteria and procedures as well as international standardization of clinical diagnostics of extranodal extension should be encouraged. Several studies demonstrate that extranodal extension results in worse survival outcomes even in HPV-positive tumors, in contrast to results of previous studies. Consequently, whether the prognostic significance of extranodal extension is not actually relevant to outcome and the staging algorithm of HPV-positive OPSCC should be questioned and further analyzed.

Indexed as

extranodal extensionHPVhuman papilloma virusOPSCCoropharyngeal carcinomaTNM classification

Identifiers

PMID32850449
PMCPMC7433688
OpenAlexW3048724978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.