ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020
CRISPR Gene Therapy: Applications, Limitations, and Implications for the Future.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 262 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
262 citing papers in PubMed, 534 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced gene editing technologies for oncology mechanisms, applications, and clinical implementation.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Advances in gene transfer technologies: comparing viral and non-viral vectors for therapeutic applications.3 Biotech · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer: Biological Functions and Technologies for Experimental and Therapeutic Applications.Cancers · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing: Understanding Differences in DNA Repair Pathways, Profiles, and Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multimodal Analysis of Aggressive Multifocal Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Associated with a Germline COL6A3 Truncating Variant: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exosome-like nanovesicles from acerola for CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery to the central nervous system.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using multifunctional nanocarriers: current advances and clinical challenges.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Programmed Cell Death of Endothelial Cells in Ischemic Heart Disease: Mechanism and Potential Cell and Gene Therapeutic Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Programmable spatiotemporal control of CRISPR-Cas12a: Engineering precision for next-generation gene editing and diagnostics.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Review
- Safety of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Mechanisms of Toxicity, Clinical Risks, and Strategies for Their Minimization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Phenotypic features of EYS-associated retinitis pigmentosa with the c.2528 G > A (p.Gly843Glu) mutation in a Japanese cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Translational Barriers to AAV and CRISPR Gene Therapy in Diabetes.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Emerging CRISPR Approaches for Countering Immune Evasion: Insight from Recent Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Enhancer-based gene therapy: a new path for precision medicine.Hereditas · 2026Review
- Targeting DNA-LNPs to Endothelial Cells Improves Expression Magnitude, Duration, and Specificity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Anatomically Guided Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery in the Eye: Overcoming Barriers for Precision Gene Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- The emerging impact of CRISPR and gene editing on global crop improvement.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Advancements in RNA-based therapies from bench to bedside.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Advances and challenges of precision epigenetic therapy in treating genomic imprinting diseases.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
202 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A series of recent discoveries harnessing the adaptive immune system of prokaryotes to perform targeted genome editing is having a transformative influence across the biological sciences. The discovery of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins has expanded the applications of genetic research in thousands of laboratories across the globe and is redefining our approach to gene therapy. Traditional gene therapy has raised some concerns, as its reliance on viral vector delivery of therapeutic transgenes can cause both insertional oncogenesis and immunogenic toxicity. While viral vectors remain a key delivery vehicle, CRISPR technology provides a relatively simple and efficient alternative for site-specific gene editing, obliviating some concerns raised by traditional gene therapy. Although it has apparent advantages, CRISPR/Cas9 brings its own set of limitations which must be addressed for safe and efficient clinical translation. This review focuses on the evolution of gene therapy and the role of CRISPR in shifting the gene therapy paradigm. We review the emerging data of recent gene therapy trials and consider the best strategy to move forward with this powerful but still relatively new technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.