Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850430›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

The Ways of Isolating Neoantigen-Specific T Cells.

Qing Li, Zhen-Yu Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Development of Cancer Immunotherapies.Cancer treatment and research · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qing LiDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhen-Yu DingDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the standard of care for a range of malignancies. Accumulating evidence suggests that the success of immunotherapy is likely attributable to neoantigen-specific T cells. Thus, adoptive cell therapy with these neoantigen-specific T cells is highly promising. This strategy has proven to successfully elicit tumor regression or even complete remission in metastatic cancer patients. However, a fundamental challenge is to effectively identify and isolate neoantigen-specific T cells or their T cell receptors (TCRs), from either tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs), and many methods have been developed to this end. In this review, we focus on the current proposed strategies for identifying and isolating neoantigen-specific T cells.

Indexed as

adoptive cell therapy (ACT)neoantigen-specific T cellsperipheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs)T cell receptor (TCR)tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)

Identifiers

PMID32850430
PMCPMC7431921
OpenAlexW3047897180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.