Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850371›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

Starting a Fire Without Flame: The Induction of Cell Death and Inflammation in Electroporation-Based Tumor Ablation Strategies.

Rebecca M Brock, Natalie Beitel-White, Rafael V Davalos, Irving C Allen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Latest Advances and Ongoing Challenges in Pulsed Field Ablation.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Targeting tumor-associated CCR2Science advances · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca M BrockGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Natalie Beitel-WhiteDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Rafael V DavalosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Irving C AllenGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Virginia Tech · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

Sub-component for Institution # 16-01848 Novel moleculary targeted therapy of GBMP01CA207206 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBINSKI, WALDEMAR · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
High-frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE) combinatorial GBM treatmentR01CA213423 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL, VERBRIDGE, SCOTT S · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Employing Novel Porcine Models of Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer to Evaluate Histotripsy Based Tumor Ablation StrategiesR21EB028429 · NIBIB · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ALLEN, IRVING C · 2019 to 2020
$428k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA207206NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213423NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB028429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapeutic strategies and paradigms are direly needed for the treatment of cancer. While the surgical removal of tumors is favored in most cancer treatment plans, resection options are often limited based on tumor localization. Over the last two decades, multiple tumor ablation strategies have emerged as promising stand-alone or combination therapeutic options for patients. These strategies are often employed to treat tumors in areas where surgical resection is not possible or where chemotherapeutics have proven ineffective. The type of cell death induced by the ablation modality is a critical aspect of therapeutic success that can impact the efficacy of the treatment and systemic anti-tumor immune system responses. Electroporation-based ablation technologies include electrochemotherapy, irreversible electroporation, and other modalities that rely on pulsed electric fields to create pores in cell membranes. These pores can either be reversible or irreversible depending on the electric field parameters and can induce cell death either alone or in combination with a therapeutic agent. However, there have been many controversial findings among these technologies as to the cell death type initiated, from apoptosis to pyroptosis. As cell death mechanisms can impact treatment side effects and efficacy, we review the main types of cell death induced by electroporation-based treatments and summarize the impact of these mechanisms on treatment response. We also discuss potential reasons behind the variability of findings such as the similarities between cell death pathways, differences between cell-types, and the variation in electric field strength across the treatment area.

Indexed as

ablationapoptosiscalciumcancerelectroporationnecrosispyroptosis

Identifiers

PMID32850371
PMCPMC7399335
OpenAlexW3045595683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.