ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Determinants of Participation and Detection Rate of Colorectal Cancer From a Population-Based Screening Program in China.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating digital nudge interventions for the promotion of cancer screening behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 test and fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal neoplasia screening in the Chinese population: A multicenter randomized noncomparative study.Chinese medical journal · 2026Trial
- Article
- Decoding Colorectal Cancer: Key Genes and Pathways in the Chinese Population Revealed.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection: an exploration road from evidence to implementation.Science bulletin · 2025Review
- Assessing factors influencing participation in LDCT lung cancer screening among high-risk urban populations in Nanjing, China.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 testing has a high positive predictive value in an average/increased-risk population: a multicenter retrospective study.Gastroenterology report · 2025Article
- Age, frequency, and strategy optimization for organized colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis conducted in China for the years 2023-2038.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Pattern of Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening from a Population-Based Screening Program in Iran.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Observational
- Trends in colorectal cancer screening compliance and incidence among 60- to 74-year-olds in China.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- The impact of marital status on tumor aggressiveness, treatment, and screening among black and white men diagnosed with prostate cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Population-based screening for colorectal cancer in Wuhan, China.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Increased detection rates of advanced colorectal adenoma in women with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Colonoscopy compliance and diagnostic yield in a large population-based colorectal cancer screening programme.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Performance of different colorectal cancer screening strategies: a long-term passive follow-up population-based screening program in Beijing, China.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Effect of sedated colonoscopy with different cost coverage on improving compliance with colorectal cancer screening in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Current Situation and Screening in North and Central Asian Countries.Cureus · 2023Review
- A simplified multiplex methylated DNA testing for early detection of colorectal cancer in stool DNA.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening With High Risk-Factor Questionnaire and Fecal Immunochemical Tests Among 5, 947, 986 Asymptomatic Population: A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Assessment of Modifiable Factors for the Association of Marital Status With Cancer-Specific Survival.JAMA network open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been widely implemented in Europe and the USA. However, there is little evidence of participation and diagnostic yields in population-based CRC screening in China. The participation rate and detection of colorectal lesions in this program were reported and related factors were explored. The analysis was conducted in the context of the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China, which recruited 282,377 eligible participants aged 40-74 years from eight cities in Henan province from 2013 to 2019. A total of 39,834 participants were evaluated to be high risk for CRC by an established risk score system and were subsequently recommended for colonoscopy. Of 39,834 with high risk for CRC, 7,454 subjects undertook colonoscopy (participation rate of 18.71%). We found that 50-64 years, high level of education, marriage, former smoking, current alcohol drinking, low levels dietary intake of vegetables, high levels dietary intake of processed meat, lack of physical activity, fecal occult blood test positive result, history of colonic polyp, history of colorectitis, and family history of CRC were associated with increased participation of colonoscopy screening. Overall, 17 CRC (0.23%), 95 advanced adenoma (1.27%), 478 non-advanced adenomas dysplasia (6.41%), 248 hyperplastic polyp (3.33%), and 910 other benign lesions (12.21%) were detected. The findings from the study will provide important references for designing effective population-based CRC screening strategies in the future. Given the relatively low participation rate, there was room for improvement in the yield of CRC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.