Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32850194›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2020

LAG-3 and PD-1+LAG-3 inhibition promote anti-tumor immune responses in human autologous melanoma/T cell co-cultures.

Nicolas Gestermann, Damien Saugy, Christophe Martignier, Laure Tillé, Silvia A Fuertes Marraco, Markus Zettl, Iñigo Tirapu, Daniel E Speiser, Grégory Verdeil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Unraveling Relatlimab-Specific Biology Using Biomarker Analyses in Patients with Advanced Melanoma in RELATIVITY-047.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. LAG-3-An incompletely understood target in cancer therapy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicolas GestermannDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Damien SaugyDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christophe MartignierDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laure TilléDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silvia A Fuertes MarracoDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Markus ZettlBoehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & CoKG, Vienna, Austria.
Iñigo TirapuBoehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & CoKG, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel E SpeiserDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Grégory VerdeilDepartment of Oncology UNIL CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-8474
University of Lausanne · CHBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade, many patients with solid tumors remain refractory to these treatments. In human cancer, the experimental options to investigate the specific effects of antibodies blocking inhibitory receptors are limited and it is still unclear which cell types are involved. We addressed the question whether the direct interaction between T cells and tumor cells can be enforced through blocking a set of inhibitory receptors including PD-1, TIM-3, BTLA and LAG-3, blocked either individually or in dual combinations with the anti-PD-1 antibody, and to determine the condition that induces maximal T cell function preventing tumor cell proliferation. Using short-term Melan-A-specific or autologous re-stimulations, checkpoint blockade did not consistently increase cytokine production by tumor-derived expanded T cells. We next set up a 5-day co-culture assay with autologous melanoma cell lines and expanded tumor infiltrating T cells, originating from tumor specimens obtained from 6 different patients. Amongst all combos tested, we observed that blockade of LAG-3 alone, and more strongly when combined with PD-1 blockade, enforced T cell responses and tumor cell growth control. The combination of anti-LAG-3 plus anti-PD-1 acted through CD8 T cells and led to increased IFNγ production and cytotoxic capacity. Our results show that LAG-3 and PD-1 are regulating the direct interaction between tumor cells and autologous T cells, suggesting that therapy effects may be promoted by enhanced access of the corresponding blocking reagents to the tumor microenvironment.

Indexed as

MelanomaProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCoculture TechniquesHumansImmunotherapyLymphocyte ActivationTumor MicroenvironmentProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorautologous T cellsCheckpoint blockadehuman melanomain vitro screeningLAG-3PD-1

Identifiers

PMID32850194
PMCPMC7422827
OpenAlexW3010808413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.