ReviewJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2020
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, a commonly overlooked etiology of acute coronary syndrome.
Review in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a type of non-atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, initially thought to be uncommon but is now being increasingly recognized as a cause of acute coronary syndrome in females. The exact incidence of this remains unknown and most of these cases undergo emergent percutaneous intervention (PCI) due to concern for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior studies have shown that PCI can be detrimental in these cases. It is important to recognize the possibility of SCAD in young female patients so that potentially harmful interventions, such as starting these patients immediately on heparin, use of thrombolytic therapy, and emergent PCI that can lead to worse outcomes, are avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.