ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2020
Ultrasonography in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis of Hand and Wrist Joints: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- nnUnet-based automated quantification of wrist joint synovitis volume in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a feasibility study.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- The Role of Imaging Techniques in the Evaluation of Extraglandular Manifestations in Patients with Sjögren's Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Arthroscopic Complete Synovectomy of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint of the Finger.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the use of ultrasonography (USG) including power Doppler in detecting hand and wrist joint changes in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare USG findings with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-four patients diagnosed as RA by 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria; with the onset of symptoms within last one year, were included in the study after institute ethical clearance and informed consent to undergo USG and contrast-enhanced MRI of the dominant affected hand. Second to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints and wrist joints (total nine joints) were evaluated for synovitis, erosions along with tenosynovitis. USG and MRI features were compared; agreement on the two imaging modalities as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography compared to MRI (gold standard) was calculated.
resultsOne hundred thirty-six MCP, 136 PIP and 34 wrist joints (total 306 joints) and 136 flexor tendons were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of USG for diagnosing synovitis was 78.6%, 91.1%, 86.1%, 85.8%, 86.3%; for erosions 67.2%, 97.5%, 84.8%, 90.5%, 91.5%; for tenosynovitis 86.5%, 100%, 100%, 92.3% and 94.8% respectively. The overall agreement between USG and MRI for detection of synovitis was achieved in 83% joints and for erosions in 89.5% joints.
conclusionIn early RA, USG was nearly as effective in diagnosing features of joint and tendon sheath involvement, with relatively better performance of USG for tenosynovitis. The performance of USG in diagnosing erosions was limited likely due to difficult access of three-dimensional joint structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.