Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849913›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Urinary stone management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a suggested approach and review of literature.

Alimohammad Fakhr Yasseri, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Urolithiasis treatment options during COVID-19 pandemic: review of current recommendations and triage systems.African journal of urology : the official journal of the Pan African Urological Surgeons' Association (PAUSA) · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alimohammad Fakhr YasseriUrology Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Kazem AghamirUrology Research Center, Sina Hospital, Hassan Abad Square, Imam Khomeini Avenue, Tehran 1416753955, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-0362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is now the major health concern of the century in many countries. Prolonged homestay has various undesirable consequences for people, such as physical inactivity and weight gain, which potentially could put people at risk of urinary stone formation. With regard to the prevention and treatment strategy for urinary stones during this COVID-19 pandemic period, patients can be divided into two groups. The first group comprises those for whom urological intervention is not indicated and where general dietary and lifestyle recommendations are helpful. The second group comprises those patients where urological intervention is indicated. This group can be divided into emergent and nonemergent subgroups. Patients with urinary stones and concomitant uremia, sepsis, anuria, or refractory pain and vomiting make up the emergent group, where intervention is necessary. The preferred option during the novel coronavirus crisis for these patients is percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion under local anesthesia. The second subgroup is made up of those patients with asymptomatic and noncomplicated renal and ureteral stones where urologic intervention is indicated in the usual time scale. However, we suggest conservative treatment for 3 months during the COVID-19 outbreak after which re-evaluation of the patient should be carried out. Thus the operation could be chosen carefully based on the patient's and urologist's preference and the rate of infection in that center.

Indexed as

COVID-19nephrolithiasisurinary calculi

Identifiers

PMID32849913
PMCPMC7425260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.