Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Default Sex and Single Gene Sex Determination in Dioecious Plants.

Quentin Cronk, Niels A Müller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional analysis ofPlant direct · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. De Novo Assembly and Annotation of 11 Diverse Shrub Willow (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The distribution of sexual function in the flowering plant: from monoecy to dioecy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. ARR17 controls dioecy inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quentin CronkDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Niels A MüllerThünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A well-established hypothesis for the evolution of dioecy involves two genes linked at a sex-determining region (SDR). Recently there has been increased interest in possible single gene sex determination. Work in

Indexed as

ARR17dioecyDiospyrosMADS-boxmonoecyOGIPopulusSRY

Identifiers

PMID32849717
PMCPMC7403218
OpenAlexW3045783552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.