Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Screening of Worldwide Barley Collection for Drought Tolerance: The Assessment of Various Physiological Measures as the Selection Criteria.

Kangfeng Cai, Xiaohui Chen, Zhigang Han, Xiaojian Wu, Shuo Zhang, Qi Li, Muhammad Mudassir Nazir, Guoping Zhang, Fanrong Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antioxidant capacity and root KPlant cell reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The potential functions ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 03: Agriculture.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comprehensive Characterization of Global Barley (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Stimulation of Tomato Drought Tolerance byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kangfeng CaiInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaohui ChenInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhigang HanInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaojian WuInstitute of Crop and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Shuo ZhangInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qi LiInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Muhammad Mudassir NazirInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Guoping ZhangInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Fanrong ZengInstitute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang University · CNZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is a devastating environmental constraint affecting the agronomic production of barley. To facilitate the breeding process, abundant germplasm resources and reliable evaluation systems to identify the true drought-tolerant barley genotypes are needed. In this study, 237 cultivated and 190 wild barley genotypes, originating from 28 countries, were screened for drought tolerance under the conditions of both water deficit and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-simulated drought at seedling stage. Drought stress significantly reduced the plant growth of all barley genotypes, but no significant difference in drought-induced reduction in the performance of barley seedlings was observed under these two drought conditions. Both cultivated and wild barley subspecies displayed considerable genotypic variability in drought tolerance, which underpinned the identification of 18 genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance. A comparative analysis of drought effects on biomass, water relation, photosynthesis, and osmotic adjustment was undertaken using these contrasting barley genotypes, in order to verify the reliability of the screening and to obtain the credible traits as screening criteria of drought tolerance in barley. As expected, the selected drought-tolerant genotypes showed much less reduction in shoot biomass than drought-sensitive ones under water deficit, which was significantly positively correlated with the results of large-scale screening, confirming the reliability of the screening for drought tolerance under two drought conditions in this study. Likewise, the traits of water relation, photosynthetic activity, and osmotic adjustment differed greatly between the contrasting genotypes under water deficit stress, and they were highly correlated to the growth of barley seedlings, suggesting the potential of them to be the selection criteria for drought tolerance. The analysis of the variable importance of these traits in drought tolerance indicated that sap osmolality and relative water content in the youngest fully-expanded leaf are the suitable selection criteria of screening for drought tolerance in barley at seedling stage.

Indexed as

barleydrought toleranceosmotic adjustmentselection criterionwater relation

Identifiers

PMID32849716
PMCPMC7403471
OpenAlexW3045966319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.