Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849712›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2020

Deciphering the Biotic and Climatic Factors That Influence Floral Scents: A Systematic Review of Floral Volatile Emissions.

Gerard Farré-Armengol, Marcos Fernández-Martínez, Iolanda Filella, Robert R Junker, Josep Peñuelas

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Floral Volatile Organic Compounds of ChinesePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Floral Volatile Organic Compounds ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Olfaction in the Anthropocene: NOScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Gerard Farré-ArmengolDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Marcos Fernández-MartínezPLECO (Plants and Ecosystems), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Iolanda FilellaCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert R JunkerDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Josep PeñuelasCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
University of Salzburg · ATCentre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESGlobal Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UABUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF M 2182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, a global analysis of the information available on the relative composition of the floral scents of a very diverse variety of plant species is missing. Such analysis may reveal general patterns on the distribution and dominance of the volatile compounds that form these mixtures, and may also allow measuring the effects of factors such as the phylogeny, pollination vectors, and climatic conditions on the floral scents of the species. To fill this gap, we compiled published data on the relative compositions and emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the floral scents of 305 plant species from 66 families. We also gathered information on the groups of pollinators that visited the flowers and the climatic conditions in the areas of distribution of these species. This information allowed us to characterize the occurrence and relative abundances of individual volatiles in floral scents and the effects of biotic and climatic factors on floral scent. The monoterpenes trans-β-ocimene and linalool and the benzenoid benzaldehyde were the most abundant floral VOCs, in both ubiquity and predominance in the floral blends. Floral VOC richness and relative composition were moderately preserved traits across the phylogeny. The reliance on different pollinator groups and the climate also had important effects on floral VOC richness, composition, and emission rates of the species. Our results support the hypothesis that key compounds or compounds originating from specific biosynthetic pathways mediate the attraction of the main pollinators. Our results also indicate a prevalence of monoterpenes in the floral blends of plants that grow in drier conditions, which could link with the fact that monoterpene emissions protect plants against oxidative stresses throughout drought periods and their emissions are enhanced under moderate drought stress. Sesquiterpenes, in turn, were positively correlated with mean annual temperature, supporting that sesquiterpene emissions are dominated mainly by ambient temperature. This study is the first to quantitatively summarise data on floral-scent emissions and provides new insights into the biotic and climatic factors that influence floral scents.

Indexed as

climatefloral volatilesphylogenypollination syndromesterpenoidsVOC compositionVOC richness

Identifiers

PMID32849712
PMCPMC7412988
OpenAlexW3046881840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.